• 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      22 days ago

      He’s been a criminal for all of his adult life. He’s just rich and white and flew under the radar enough. If he had just fucked off into retirement on some island rather than becoming president (and committing more crimes) you’d probably never hear about him anymore and he could have lived in peace.

    • Westwolf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 days ago

      Nelson Mandela was a convicted criminal when he was elected president of South Africa. Vaclav Havel was a convicted criminal when he was elected president of the Czech Republic. Corrupting the legal system to criminalize political opposition does very little to make a political figure less popular. Often, it just makes them martyrs.

      • TaterTurnipTulip@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        22 days ago

        Trump is no Mandela. And something tells me Trump’s supporters would feel very different about voting for someone like Mandela…

          • jhymesba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            21 days ago

            Nah, it’s you missing the point.

            Trump wasn’t convicted for who he was. He doesn’t get a pass because of who he is or the fact he’s running for President, either. A jury of 12 people unanimously declared that the prosecution proved their case 34 times. Any one of them could have said no to the charges. In fact, one seemed to be very interested in that course of action. But in a room with only 11 other people, he weighed the evidence, considered the charges, listened to the arguments made by both the Defence and Prosecution, and then, with all of that weighing on his mind, and with the added weight of his conscience, came to the conclusion that he couldn’t get Trump off on a SINGLE charge.

            Put Trump’s supporters on a jury for a trial of a Black man doing the shit Trump did, they’d ABSOLUTELY convict that Black man of the charges they insist were cooked up for Trump on the exact same evidence, WHILE protesting that Trump was unfairly convicted by “Demoncrat plants and lawyers and Deep State Operatives”. Fortunately, our court system is designed to filter out these kinds of people, which is why I don’t buy your bullshit about ‘corrupting the legal system’. It’s not corrupted, despite all the effort Team Pepe puts into it. Now buzz off with your nonsense.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Corrupting the legal system to criminalize political opposition does very little to make a political figure less popular. Often, it just makes them martyrs.

        It’s a good thing that didn’t happen. Having an independent state prosecutor bring state crimes in front of a jury of his peers in a public trial has been a great example of democracy working as intended.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    22 days ago

    Trump can’t win with only 58 percent of the Republican vote. He needs somewhere in area of at least 80 - 90 percent. I see this survey result as good news.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 days ago

        This isn’t a poll of all voters, it’s a poll of Republican voters. Interpret it as you wish, but you have no evidence that it doesn’t mean shit.

            • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              22 days ago

              I paid attention to the polls in 2016 and thought Trump didn’t stand a chance, so I voted 3rd party like I always do. I was wrong. I no longer pay attention to polls.

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                I paid attention to polls, as well. They swung wildly around as the news cycle shifted between bad news for Trump and bad news for Hillary. Then, Comey’s letter drops at the perfect time (deliberate or not) to bring Hillary’s numbers just low enough to give Trump an edge in key states. That happened too late for any new polls to absorb the info before the election.

                When Fivethirtyeight.com was giving around 75% chance for a Hillary victory, that doesn’t mean her victory was assured. It means Trump needed to flip two coins and have them both come up heads.

                Polls aren’t useless. They are a statistical tool. People applied them badly.

                • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  Comey’s stunt was deliberate AF. And it was an unforgivable crime that likely leads to the US becoming a dictatorship. If I were in Comey’s presence, I’d spit in his face for what he did.

              • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                21 days ago

                Well good for you, but this poll isn’t about the general. It is no different than opinion surveys taken every day. It has nothing to do with the electoral college.

        • jhymesba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          His message here is that Republicans can SAY whatever they want to to pollsters, and there’s a movement out on Team Pepe to do just that.

          “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality, judiciously, as you will, we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors, and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

          Never forget that.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    22 days ago

    The opposite of what they said in 2016. That’s Republicanism for you. No values or integrity.

  • suction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    21 days ago

    How often are we going to act surprised that it’s a cult, and he is their Fuhrer? This is getting ridiculous, the time for analysis of their side is over. We should long be in the phase of action.

    • Cosmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 days ago

      Trying to find it again, but I had seen a set of polls earlier where they had asked some republicans “Would you be ok with a convicted felon as president?” and other republicans “would you be ok with Trump as president if he were a convicted felon?”, and the ones asked the Trump version had said yes at a much higher rate than the generic question.

    • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      That’s one thing that drives me fucking crazy, voters let that single letter define if they support policy or hate it. If trump had done and said everything he’s done over the last several years but had a (D) they would hate him. And vice versa.

      • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        22 days ago

        It’s not a bipartisan issue. Democrats do not have the same slavish adoration for their leaders that Republicans do.

          • psvrh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            22 days ago

            Al Franken quit. Bob Menendez is facing trial. Rod Blagojevich was convicted. Wiener and Cuomo were shamed from office

            Jim Jordan is still there. Matt Gaetz is still there. It took comic-book levels of evil to turf Santos.

            And then we have Trump.

            So no, being critical of your own team isn’t bipartisan. It may have been at one time, but that’s at least thirty years ago.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            22 days ago

            You’re a god damned idiot if you don’t think there would be at least as much genocide under Trump.

      • jhymesba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        Another voice calling you out on this bullshit.

        Team Blue has kicked and will kick members out who give the party a bad name. Hell, they’ll kick 'em out before the conviction. That doesn’t happen with Republicans, with only Santos (gee, Hispanic name, I wonder why) facing the music for his bullshit in all of the GQP.

        Fuck this Both Sides bullshit. It’s not true, and we shouldn’t stand for it.

        • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          They kick Henry Cuellar, pro life under federal investigation. They didn’t kick Menendez currently under indictment. They didn’t kick pro life Pelosi.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    22 days ago

    No surprise. They ended up agreeing that he was guilty of impeachable offenses too, but were okay with it and didn’t want him to be kicked out or made non-electable because of them. “One of us”, literally.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 days ago

      Seems like the people capable of saying “I don’t know” are the only ones with consistency.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          That could open the gates to one party weaponizing the justice system and jailing the opposition. That’s the only reason I don’t support such a requirement.

          I would answer IDK in the poll

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 days ago

          And I’ve consistently been of the opinion they should barring certain crimes. I hate this felon’s guts, not a fan of most felons to be honest, but a vandalism felony as a 19 year old? Drug dealers? And that’s not getting into felonies I’m questionable as to if they should be crimes.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          +1 for angry commies message. I believe that’s why we would actually want to be able to elect a felon.

          It’s up to the people to use their brains (…lmfao) and try to understand if it’s really just a political hit or if they’re a legitimate criminal. Of course in a world of Faux News, Newsmax, and Facebook Karens, figuring out what to believe is becoming increasingly more impossible as is the intent.

          It’s getting old but it’s insane how many comments this fits so I need to say it again: I FUCKING HATE PROPAGANDISTS!

          The problem of billionaires and propagandists are one in the same.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            21 days ago

            It’s up to the people to use their brains (…lmfao)

            My radicalizing adult realization was that as a species we’re incredibly dumb.

            And I don’t mean that in terms of the usual way in which people say “people are dumb!” and throw their hands in the air to explain the latest absurd thing.

            I mean on a deeper, more fundamental and hopeless level. We are not reasonable, rational creatures. Just because we figured out what rationality means and can employ it as a tool, generally across most of our species we are survival machines, and our brains are tuned to do one thing only, which is explain why you feel things so you can predict danger.

            This makes us ridiculously easy to manipulate and sway, because we have vastly deep brains that will create an entire universe of stories to explain an emotion, and it will do this in your own voice so you think it’s your own good ideas and it will fool you into believing your own stories, even if they don’t make a shred of sense. This is why you can have educated, smart people like doctors and nurses become anti-vax or climate scientists denying climate change. We are entirely emotional creatures and we trick ourselves into believing our fears all day long, every day, and we can’t ever get out. We’re stuck down a hole with no way out. Lost in our own world of biases and attaching to backwards storylines to explain them.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    21 days ago

    There’s this thing called the Overton Window. Republicans are way past that. It’s no longer relevant. Whatever their guy does will always be fine while if his opponents do it, it will be the end of all that is good and just.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    22 days ago

    Then they can’t claim to be the party of law and order anymore.

    Unfortunately they won’t need to. They’ve been playing a different game than the rest of us.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      By reaching out to them instead of ridiculing all of them. Sure, a lot of them are completely hopeless and unreedemable, but a great number of them are not.

      • sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        21 days ago

        I get what you’re saying, but anyone still supporting this guy is well beyond just reaching out. Nothing, I really mean nothing, you say will make an impact because of how isolated the source of information they get is. Anyone on the fence has already jumped off.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 days ago

          John Stewart had a great segment recently where he really went off on “the media” but I kinda disagreed with his “there is no 2 realities” thing.

          I understand he means there is only one truth, the chicken either crossed the road or it didn’t, we don’t have Schrodinger’s chicken, but what we DO have are media outlets with a specific agenda that WANT to create an alternate reality where they are always the victim and they are always correct. Whether we like it or not we do have multiple stories of our shared reality and when you choose to follow one of them you decide what reality you want to believe you live within…

          Again, my daily mantra: I FUCKING HATE PROPAGANDISTS!

          • sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            I agree on the 2 reality thing. Anyone who disagrees can go look at this most recent trial coverage, or any of the hearings and see that is the case. Anytime anyone says anything it’s only for the clip to be on the news that night and that’s it. An endless loop of the same thing. I literally went to read the jury instructions on the NY court website then immediately saw a flat out lie about what they were.

      • jhymesba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        21 days ago

        Are you fucking kidding me with this bullshit?! You don’t really believe this, do you?

        To them, we’re all a bunch of baby-eating, baby-fucking Satan worshippers, the most evil sort of evil, and you don’t compromise with evil. Gawd is on their side, and we’re the devil incarnate to be opposed by word all the time, and by action (with guns) when they feel they can get away with it. Don’t believe me? See this article and know that these people are fucking nuts and fucking real.

        The only ones that can pull them out of the BS factory are they themselves. And unless and until they choose to do so, I am sure fucking going to keep ridiculing them.

        Our better play is to stop thinking that we can tolerate 4 more years of Trump just because we didn’t get EVERYTHING we wanted out of Biden. The Trumpers are firmly devoted to their God-Emperor, and those who are voting GQP who don’t like Trump are despicable and unreachable in their own rights.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          we’re all a bunch of baby-eating, baby-fucking Satan worshippers,

          God, I hope it’s not the same baby…

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          To them, we’re all a bunch of baby-eating, baby-fucking Satan worshippers

          Yeah, like every other blanket statement on a large group of people, that’s not true dude. Touch grass et al.

      • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 days ago

        Please share with us your reasoning and evidence that there are a great number who are not irredeemable. Because I don’t see it.