• Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    ·
    2 months ago

    Trump is trying to get thrown in jail. His court appearance donation bumps are slowing, and he can’t campaign or fundraise properly. His only chance to avoid prosecution is to win the election. Throwing Trump in jail for tweeting will energize his base.

    Meanwhile, letting him rant on “Failing” Truth Social every night then get fined $1,000 by the judge every morning makes him look petty.

    • Countess425@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve seen lots of speculation that Trumbo is trying to get himself thrown in jail for the publicity of it all. It would result in a huge fundraising boost and conservative outrage, even if just for a short while, and no one wants to give him the satisfaction.

      • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        2 months ago

        Conservatives generate outrage at anything and they donate to him regardless.

        This is a lame excuse for why they won’t lock his arse up.

          • capital_sniff@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’d be curious if anyone is doing an accounting of the total take though. I get that his campaign isn’t raising as much money, but how many sneakers did they sell? I’m assuming they sold a few bibles and I’d assume he has his fingers in the 2 billion Kushner took for “investments.”

            • Countess425@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              You don’t think he’s spending any of that on his campaign or legal fees, do you? That’s his money.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 months ago

        Call his fucking bluff.

        In jail, no phone, no internet, no interviews. The only way he’d get to talk to the public is though his lawyer, who is accountable to tell the truth when discussing details of the case.

      • twistypencil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Unsure that would happen… Lots of undecided out there who care about the rule of law and have said in polls if he was convicted they would not vote for him. I think it’s delusion and wishful thinking on his part

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          of undecided out there who care about the rule of law

          Doubt.

          have said in polls if he was convicted they would not vote for him

          Why would you believe a group of people that are insane enough to still be “undecided” on Trump. Don’t be a sucker.

          • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            I keep saying it, those ‘undecided’ and ‘middle of the road’ people are actually just embarrassed conservatives. They don’t wanna be seen as Trumpers while still voting for him.

          • twistypencil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            You think everyone cares and pays attention to politics? I can introduce you to hundreds of people that I know of who don’t even know who is running

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Then how do they suddenly have an opinion that’s based on the results of his trial? How do they even know its happening? How will they find out the verdict?

              • twistypencil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Because the trial and the result is all over the news and will be historic if he is found guilty. That is different than politics, that is headline news.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  So they somehow missed 4 years of Trump dominating the news, yet they’re dialed into the trial?

                  Not buying it.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    2 months ago

    “I’ve asked you eight or nine times to show me the exact post and you’ve not been able to show me even once,” the judge told him.

    “You’re losing all credibility, I’ll tell you that right now,” he later added.

    The judge has found Trump’s weakness: facts that back up his hyperbole.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lock him the fuck up already.

    Preferably, max security prison, brick over the entrance, cover in sound insulation… more bricks followed by a giant pour of bank vault mix.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    2 months ago

    Relevant context, Judge Merchan is not covered in the gag order which is likely why Trump is venting his petulant frustration his way. The judge has shown he gives no fucks for the impotent insults Trump is hurling.

    Trump probably would like to moan about everyone involved in the case. If he is dictating his tweets to an intern, then likely the intern doesn’t press Send on the ones that discuss the people protected by the order.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I was going to write the same thing if you hadn’t. It’s a shame I had to scroll so far past the “judge won’t do anything” comments to someone else who’s actually reading the court notes.

      He reduced the counts from 10 to 8, due to the defense’s argument about clarification of reposting vs posting, but has yet to rule on the order violations. It’ll likely be the $1,000 per infraction recommendation of the prosecution, with possible jail time for future infractions.

      Merchan doesn’t play around, but he’s also smart not to give Trump any reason to claim bias or mistrial. By the book is the right play here.

      • azimir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        One issue is that NY law only allows the judge two options: max $1000 or up to 30 days in jail.

        This means the judge can’t crank the financial option and jail is still viewed as the nuclear option with high stakes, mostly about the appeals process that could stall the case, just like the DC case.

        • Beryl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 months ago

          And that’s why we need fines proportional to an individual’s actual net worth.

        • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I hope he’s building a paper trail to make it absolutely bulletproof when he puts trump in jail and points to numerous fines and warnings that did nothing at all to deter him. An appeal should conclude that if anything, this judge gave trump too many chances before finally jailing him.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Should have day fines in use to not have such a silly maximum that just makes offenses so easy for the wealthy who can toss thousands around.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The $1,000 per infraction cap is good for the lulz. Trump can easily get 10+ violations. Can he do 100+? I think he can!

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Covfefe”

      The man used to fall asleep with Twitter open and then accidentally tweet nonsense. I doubt he’s got anyone else in control of his social media now. I even remember reading how his staff pleaded with him to not Tweet the week of the election

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is just to show that the judge won’t put him in jail for any reason at all. Rules don’t apply to the (even fake) wealthy like they do normal folk.

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      I am not arguing - at all - against the fundamental unfairness of the justice system, like at a foundational level. And I refuse to grant Trump even the favor of my hatred. He is as vile and wicked a creature as has ever plagued society.

      But that ain’t what this is about.

      If you were jailed tonight, justly or not, how many would rise up in your name?

      It isn’t fair, but it’s the reality.

      • xkforce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        2 months ago

        The justice system should not care how big that mob is. Thats the sort of shit that destroys civilization.

        • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 months ago

          There seems to be plenty of police available to shut down universities over Palestine protests, so it’s not a staffing issue to put him in jail and keep the building guarded. They have plenty of shields, pepper bullets, rubber bullets, teargas, etc in case his coward supporters go for a full January 6 here. So golly gee, I just can’t quite figure out what the issue is here. /s

          In reality, I get it. The judge doesn’t want to be in history books for putting a major presidential candidate and ex president in jail, especially just a few months before the election, especially when he really can’t guarantee that person’s safety. Imagine what happens if trump dies in jail. If we could trust police to be public servants rather than an organized gang engaging in racketeering against the working class as directed by the owning class, then maybe we could see proper justice.

          What’s maybe most frustrating is that we all see that the state can be swayed by assumed mob reactions from the right, yet the left doesn’t dare weaponize those same implied threatens that we can clearly see are effective. Most cops are cowards. We are angrier and better armed than most on the right can imagine, and the system isn’t sufficiently afraid of us.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          It would be a kind of reversed lynch justice if the mob prevented real justice from happening. Is there a special term for it?

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t hate it.

      I do fully think if justice were applied equally, he’d already be in jail. And I personally think it would be sorta funny to watch the people too dumb to learn from the failed insurrection try to storm a jail belonging to one of the most violent police gangs in the U.S.

      But the strategy of not giving Trump reasons to whine about unfair treatment is sound. And perhaps supporters will see he’s getting special treatment, and realize that’s another way they aren’t like him.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    What happens when someone finds out that there are no consequences to ones actions. He’s basically a child!