• guriinii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    166
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is so fucked up. Across various social media platforms you have genocidal Zionists loons saying what they want using #KillThemAll, but yet Palestinian voices are being silenced and ol Melon Husk bans the phrase “From the river to the sea…”.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          7 months ago

          It means different things to different people. There are definitely a few that use it with a genocidal intent. But as you said that he’s not it’s de facto or historical meaning. It has a much longer history than the last few months. Most people complaining about it only just learned of it. And have no idea about its history or what it actually tends to mean.

        • sheogorath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          7 months ago

          Don’t mind them. They probably felt uncomfortable hearing “Black Lives Matter” too. Saying it’s a call for genocide for white people.

        • JoeHill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Is Kibbutz Be’eri on occupied land?

          Is Tel Aviv on occupied land?

          Is Haifa on occupied land?

            • JoeHill@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              In other words, “Death to Israel!!!”

              Edit: in before “No no. You have to understand that ‘Death to Israel’ is an aspirational call for peace”

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I think Jews and Palestinians both need a place where they can feel safe from anyone trying to kill them off since it’s something one group has already been through and the other group is going through right now and both are at risk from it happening again in the future. This means they either need to give one group a new homeland, which, at this point, would be ethnic cleansing of either group, or find a way for them to share one homeland safely. No ethnic cleansing should be allowed and future ethnic cleansing should be prevented to the best of the international community’s ability.

                  Personally, I would prefer UN administration of the region until something equitable for both Jews and Palestinians can be resolved.

                • Globeparasite@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yes and what guarantees for the Israeli. Various palestinian factions have been commiting massacre and pogroms since the 1930’s where they had a german-sized nazi movement.

                  The government is what guaranty people’s right and safety.

                  This is exactly why the Palestinian state exist and Arafat refused to integrate into Israel

              • gmtom@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                21
                ·
                7 months ago

                So we’re Indians wanting to get rid of the British Raj all genocidal maniacs?

                • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Not a great comparison as Brits have Britain to live in already (I’m British, if it matters).

                  If you displaced the Brits from India back in the day, they could return to Britain.

                  If you displace the Jews from Israel now, where could they go?

              • guriinii@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                7 months ago

                That’s a leap. It means an end to the illegal occupation, apartheid, and Zionism. Give the land back to the indigenous people. I’ve seen talks of the establishment of a secular state where all can be free, which is the ideal here. Not the genocide and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians

                • JoeHill@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Right…

                  You just called for the destruction of Israel. You just said Tel Aviv, which was built on land purchased from the Bedouin, is on occupied land.

                  You just said that Be’eri is on occupied land. Since it’s on occupied land, then Hamas’ murder of 100 people is justified in your mind.

                  Palestinian policemen massacred non-Zionist Jews in Hebron in 1929. The government of Gaza massacred left-wing Jews in Be’eri in 2023. And you sit here and talk binational bullshit fantasies.

                  From the river to the sea, you want it to be Judenfrei.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Give the land back to the indigenous people.

                  That’s easy to say, but means nothing until you define who the “indigenous people” are, which is an extremely fraught topic in this particular case.

                • Globeparasite@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Give the land back to the indigenous people

                  Oh my sweet, sweet summer child. That’s a statement both sides agree on, but not in the way you think

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The Baha’i will not surrender Haifa. That’s our Holy City since you kicked us out of Shiraz and Baghdad. We’ve been there since the Arabs put us there in 1890.

            Edit: sorry Lemmy replied to the wrong comment.

        • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, and the end of those “illegal occupiers” too.

          Both sides want to genocide each other, it’s just that Israel is more powerful and Palestine is the underdog

    • Globeparasite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      Across various social media platforms you have genocidal

      Honestly if you look outside your comforts zone you’ll realise every genocidal maniacs have been hanging out on twitter since its creation. After the terror attack in France we had all the insane islamist praising the asshole, that’s nothing new

    • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I agree banning that phrase seems hypocritical but what is wrong with calling for the killing of a militia that killed thousands of civilians? Wouldn’t this be like the killing of osama bin laden after 9/11? Didn’t they kill hundreds of young people at a music festival promoting peace? I’m aware there’s collateral but calling for a ceasefire to protect civilians is the only reason to suggest the killing stops when their enemy has openly stated it will not stop doing this ever. If they want change to their policy of genocide of isralies I’m sure that’s a good start to peace talks but so far I don’t think they have.

      • guriinii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think you’re confused. It is Israel committing genocide and have said they will never stop even after all the hostages are released.

        • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          No, I don’t think I am but may be. Are you saying hamas didn’t kill all those unarmed civilians and are you saying hamas has never stated they have a mandate to destroy the whole of Israel? Please just stick to those two questions and then make any points you want to add after. Thankyou

  • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m not going to twitter to see but are they still using the little blue bird? I thought everything was X now.

  • drathvedro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 months ago

    Musk fired most of the moderators, and those messages are being sent automatically after a certain time period. I did an experiment before - searched for phrases like “death to nationality” and “kill all nationality”, with various nationalities, and reported a dozen each to check if there is any bias: There isn’t, all of them were ignored. I believe any moderators left, if there are still any, work by the queue of most reported first, and the top of the queue is most likely filled with brigaded reports from right wing trolls.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you don’t use specific keywords, there’s essentially no moderation on Twitter right now. All of their moderation is via keyword.

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’ll find that right wing lunatics are perfectly capable of being both virulently anti-Semitic and dogmatically pro-Israel, especially when being pro-Israel means either fulfilling some prophecy or other from Revelations, or promoting violence against Muslims. The cognitive dissonance of hating Jews while supporting a Jewish ethnostate is secondary to those other things.

      • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        They think it works like positive and negative charges. Where if they support Israel’s genocide then it cancels out all the antisemitic bullshit they’ve spewed.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Elon literally supported a Tweet that said Jews were going to destroy white people.

      You know that, right?

      Or are you going to claim that isn’t antisemitic?

      • chimpo_the_chimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Wtf lol I wasn’t making a stance and don’t care about Twitter or Elon. It’s just funny seeing back to back posts claiming completely opposite points as fact.

    • kurwa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can probably find a lot of anti semitic stuff on there. Hell Elon was posting some the other day. But that doesn’t mean you aren’t going to find anti Arab / anti muslim shit, or specifically this pro zionist garbage. Remember, there’s a lot of pro zionists who are also white supremacists.

  • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    Instructions unclear - applied guidance to people named James Woods with a career in acting, born April 18, 1947.

    Aside from Musk’s Nazi tendencies, was this fine because Woods didn’t specify the target of his call to genocide?

  • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    He could have just decided to be a chill dude, retired from acting, maybe opened a golf pro shop with Jeremy Irons. Or I guess there’s this approach.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      7 months ago

      The ceasefire isn’t to protect Hamas. It’s to protect the civilians the IDF are hellbent on labeling terrorists.

      If you agree with collective punishment, then congratulations: You’re more morally reprehensable than the allies were in WWII after nukes were used. Literally OK with war crimes.

        • soupcat@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          The problem here is the amount of innocent Palestinians being killed. Are you cool with killing innocent civilians?

          • PatFusty@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I dont think anyone is as bloodthirsty for civilians as you make them out to be (unless you are Hamas wanting to eradicate the jews river to the sea style). Simply, Hamas is the problem and i would rather a world without them. Its sad that the innocent have casualties, but i would still blame Hamas for their dirty human shield tactics.

            • soupcat@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              You don’t think #killthemall is bloodthirsty? Or the frightening amount of innocent women and children killed? You can’t use Hamas to keep justifying a genocide and you’re incredibly ignorant of history if you think Hamas is the problem, Hamas is a symptom of Israel’s occupation of Palestine.

          • PatFusty@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Nuance in whther or not I support a terror organization? Yeah thats a no from me any way its spun. Dont come at me when your favorite terror group recruits children as fodder and use their death as justification for more senseless terror.

        • force@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Your government is terroristic, why are you so cool with terrorists and genocide? Your tax dollars are going directly to slaughtering small children, what do you have to say for yourself?

          • PatFusty@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Are we talking about Hamas here still? How much money did gaza alone get in foreign aid this year again only to not spend on munitions and not launch terror strikes? Interesting

  • Glowstick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    His comment rightly SHOULDN’T be removed. I strongly disagree with him, but he should be allowed to say it.

    • AmberPrince@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      7 months ago

      I disagree. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence. His consequence is that the other people that live in the society he shares is fed up with him and do not want him to take part in it anymore. He can go somewhere else. We don’t want to hear it.

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Allowed” by whom?

      The right to free speech protects him from the government, not a content policy from a private company.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Free speech is a concept that exists outside the first ammendment or other laws. Pretending it doesn’t is intellectually dishonest.

        • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean, sure, it’s a concept that exists, but so is the concept of, “Talk shit, get hit.”

          Concepts aren’t enforcable. Laws and policies are. Please learn the difference.

            • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I agree, which is why we have laws and content policies in order to enforce when free speech is acceptable or not.

    • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      I used to feel the same in these situations, but then I learned about the paradox of tolerance. Now I am much more of the opinion that James is free to say whatever he wants about any subject, but no one is required to give him a platform to do so.

    • soupcat@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t understand free speech absolutists. You don’t think that maybe calling for all Palestinians to be killed is maybe a bit genocidal and should perhaps be discouraged on a social media platform?

      Mind you this isn’t a law and wouldn’t lead to any actual limiting of liberties, it just means we discourage genocide on social media. Something that seems pretty reasonable to me, and I think any large enough platform should probably feel some obligation to do.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        I wonder if they would still feel that way if they knew how radio stations were used to foment the Rwandan genocide?

        Who am I kidding? Probably.

    • Narrrz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’ll agree he should be allowed to say it when people who say shit like this get held accountable and suffer consequences.

      so, in essence, i disagree.

  • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    James Woods has one of the highest IQs on record, but it goes to show you that being smart doesn’t make you smart…if you catch my drift.

    ETA: not really sure why people took exception to this. It has been reported many times over the years that he is supposed to be exceptionally intelligent and I am certainly not making this up.