• edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    137
    ·
    7 months ago

    You get a 5 second delay before they flip the switch if you’re a firefox user.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    7 months ago

    Denying profit to corporations is theft, so using adblockers will be put on the same level as digital piracy. How dare you consume content without letting your eyeballs get force-fed ads.

    • WereCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      ME - “Not looking at the billboard when driving to work”

      Police - “STOP! You violated a law!”

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      To this day, I have never bought something because of an ad. I get the concept of letting people know your product exists, but I know Raid Shadow Legends exists already and I am not interested, so fuck off.

      • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 months ago

        I would like to tell everyone that Raid: Shadow Legends is a shitty game and nobody should play it.

        This message is brought to you by me, a private citizen with a desire for you not to waste your time.

      • WereCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        So you admit that you’re a thief? If you see an ad it’s MANDATORY to buy that product otherwise the owner of the ad spent money for that ad for nothing!!!

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      Denying profit to corporations is theft

      Absolutely right. In fact, it should be illegal to see a product for sale and not immediately buy it. How dare you see a helpless corporation in need of money, freezing in the streets, and not immediately empty your wallet in exchange for trinkets that they so lovingly engineered to break in a set amount of time? You monster!

    • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      For a sec. I thought were fr in the first sentence. Then i remembered wich platform we’re on and why that probably is.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Using ad blockers is piracy, insofar as you’re avoiding paying the price the content provider has set for that content. The price is watching the ads, rather than being something directly monetary, and you’re not paying it.

      That said, neither that nor piracy are theft, and in both cases I gladly pirate because the prices in most instances have gotten away too high for what you get. Either in terms of subscription cost, or the time and quantity of ads delivered.

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If blocking ads is piracy, then ad-viewing is equated to money and showing ads while either failing to provide the service the user wanted or not providing any at all is theft.

        • mriormro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          This is a bit of a chicken and an egg scenario. Who pays first? The user, the content creator, or the content host?

          • AntEater@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Who pays first? The user, the content creator, or the content host?

            I couldn’t care less. If my adblocker is that final straw that caused a company to go out of business, brings on the collapse of the internet as a whole, and ultimately the breakdown of western civilization, then all of it deserves to die. With that knowledge, I’d still update by block lists and donate to adblocking projects.

          • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            The user “pays” the creator and host at the same time by watching an ad, so it depends on when it plays. Not sure what you’re getting at.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        From what I understand, Youtube ain’t paying for content anyway. Creators are routinely being de-monitized

        • vithigar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          What? That piracy is fine and people should be honest with themselves about doing it?

            • vithigar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              It can certainly be both. A worse service might be worth a cheaper price. And people will pay extra for good service. That’s literally the airline ticket business model.

              It was also 100% a payment issue back when I was a broke student and paying for things simply wasn’t an option. The fact that Steam offered a more convenient service than the pirates at the time was irrelevant because I couldn’t afford it.

              • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                This is a good point.

                If you cannot pay, then you either pirate or not - you don’t buy, because you can’t. In either case, the producer loses nothing, because there is nothing to gain.

                In the other case where you could pay, but doing so is much more painful than pirating, the producer is the idiot - they made it painful to buy. They are losing sales not because people don’t want to pay but because they make buying the product painful.

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    All of you using adblockers are pathetic. You’ll willingly deprive companies of their revenue just because you can’t be bothered to see a few ads? It’s not like ads are harmful or anything!

    …hang on I think porn just started playing on my computer I have to find where the popup is and close it… Right after I close this other popup that says I’ve won 69 trillion dollars, and this one for dick pills, and this one for free vbucks, and this online casino one, and that one saying I have 420 viruses on my PC, and this one from the local fringe religious group that says I’ll go to hell if I poop, and this one that straight up looks like it’s trying to download ransomware, and… Damn my battery just died from all the extra processing power those popups needed. Uh but adblock is still evil though, don’t forget that.

  • N0body@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 months ago

    “Tell President Zuckerberg my only regret is that I have but one life to give to block his ads.”

    • nrezcm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Ask not what social media can do for you but what you can do for social media.”

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Once they fully implement eyeball tracking to determine if you’re actually looking at ads, we’re all doomed.

      • bruhduh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It already was implemented in remote exams sooooo… As soon as society opinion is ready, and wait till musk will roll out his crazy neuralink, those of us who can’t tinker with tech are doomed indeed

        • cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          And the things we find horrifying now will just be normal to the next generation. Remember when we used the term “creepshot”? The youngest adults today don’t understand what that is.

  • nfsu2@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Having friends that have no idea of adblockers, or scripblockers are makes me feel prehistoric

  • lapislazuli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You’ve still got some miles left in you, don’t give up! Unless they’re green, then you’re screwed.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s an even worse crime to be running custom ROM on your phone or basically not just running whatever it came with with bootloader locked.

    • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah but I don’t think they’ll go for since there are far less people using custom ROM than using an adblocker

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        They’re already doing it. See custom ROMs and Google Wallet. A lot of banking apps refuse to work. Then there’s random apps like McDonald’s that refuse to work on custom ROMs or if the device is rooted.

        Banking apps I kinda get even though I think it’s ass, but McD’s??

        • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean’t getting executed. Although I see your point. Either way I don’t plan on going back to stock. Los grew on me. Sucks but you could get them working with a sandbox. I used Gbox for a while but decided to stop for privacy reasons.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            I managed to get Google Wallet working with Magisk + Zygisk + Play Integrity Fixer. Aaand my bank’s app stopped working.

            It’s all so tiring.

            • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Try Gbox or Google Space. Didn’t try banking apps but stopped receiving custom ROM on WhatsApp Signal and some other apps. Highly recommend using shelter from f-droid

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                I wouldn’t feel comfortable using Gbox or Gspace for banking, considering they don’t seem to be open source apps. Then again, searching online, a lot of people seem to be saying Wallet and banking apps don’t work with those solutions.

                I’ll probably have to settle with my banking app not working and paying with card.

        • PeWu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          The comedy is that my banking app refuses to use biometrics (after update), because it says I have ““not original”” ROM, which is false. If this goes further I will flash firmware just for that app to think I have original ROM.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m in a weird position where my Google Wallet refused to work with my original ROM (MIUI) since I had unlocked bootloader, but my banking app worked. It used to be that both worked with my custom ROM, but now Wallet doesn’t work. I fixed that with Magisk + Zygisk + Play Integrity Fixer but then my banking app stopped working.

            Fucking hell, just let me use whatever I want