• bamboo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              10 months ago

              In US schools they teach it as the US just withdrawaling due to cost and domestic pressure because teaching it as a loss would really tarnish the whole “we never lose wars, USA #1!” narrative.

              • GreenMario@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                10 months ago

                Can confirm this. My teacher started sweating when I asked if that means Vietnam won. Didn’t get an answer just a subject change and the redneck kids in class eyeballing me funny. Sorry fuckos your daddies raged quit the field. That’s a loss. Git gud scrub 😂

              • 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                In US schools they teach it as the US just withdrawaling due to cost and domestic pressure

                Also known as “losing.” LOL

                Most modern wars happen like this. Both sides commit until committing becomes untenable for one of the parties. That’s pretty much the only path to victory for Ukraine, for instance.

              • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Technically the domestic/international pressure is the actual reason for the loss. The US had the capability to rule the ashes, but domestic and international pressure caused the withdrawal.

            • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              10 months ago

              I would consider Korea a draw. I wonder how much people conflate the two wars as they had similar objectives in the same world region.

            • PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I mean, the US was kicked out, but I don’t know if I’d call what happened to Vietnam “winning” either. It’s more accurate to say they outlasted the Americans.

    • RapidcreekOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Both President Obama and President Trump assured Vietnamese leaders in the past that the United States respects Vietnam’s differing political system.

        • RapidcreekOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          China first invaded Vietnam in 111BC. Different dynasties had different priorities. But, off and on China comes across the border with several battalions. The Vietnamese just waits them out.

      • RapidcreekOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, but Vietnam won no battle I know of. The US lost the will to prosecute the war due to unacceptable losses and loss of support by the US population. I kind of doubt they won militarily over China either. Don’t know about France.

        • Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          The US failed to achieve all of its strategic objectives in the war while Vietnam achieved all of theirs.

          The US lost the war.

        • bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sounds like we sent soldiers over to die in a foreign nation over no real basis to do so and got our soldiers asses handed to them by farmers

          • RapidcreekOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Correct. But with one exception and one addition. To call them farmers would be belittling them. They weren’t. Add the fact that conscription by the US was last used in this war.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Both sarcastically and not. It kind of contrast the superficiality of political economies with regards to geopolitics. There’s a universe out there where America did Communism and China did Capitalism. Weird

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wait. Viet Nam as a proxy against China… Where have I heard that before…

      Oh well, probably not important.