• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I said “Being a hell state isn’t a criterion for sanctions.” Sanctions don’t work the way you think they do. They don’t actually punish the people who make hell states the hell states that they are. If they did, then the hell state that would be among those that deserve it the most would be the USA. Do you agree with this?

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, but whether or not I agree the US should be sanctioned is not relevant here.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Cool, because being a “hell state” is not relevant for sanctions.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, because they reclaimed the oil instead of handing it over to western companies.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Yeah I’m all for destabilizing them too. Let’s do it in lieu of carbon taxes since it will have the same net result for the average American.

                  I am most definitely pro-intervention. Freedom is non-negotiable, and free countries have a moral imperative to spread liberal democracy across the planet. The strong have an obligation to protect the weak.