• Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    3 months ago

    Another great example is “Chunk” from the Goonies (1985). He was considered so fat that it was comic relief. Now you can walk through any Middle School in the United States and find dozens, if not hundreds, of kids that are MUCH larger!

    • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      137
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m the flip side, Go back and watch Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. Once you’re done cringing at the racism, think about the fact that Harrison Ford went on an intense weightlifting program for that movie, and was considered the most shredded leading man in Hollywood at the time. Actors using steroids has become so common that it has also skewed our perception of a normal fit guy’s body.

      • fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        IMO Harrison Ford looks pretty damn fit in that picture and I wouldn’t bat an eye if he were in a super hero movie today. Like that’s not a Thor body but there are many characters where that body would fit in just fine. I agree that movie bodies are not very attainable for most people with busy lives, but on the other hand, if you’re playing a super hero you’re not playing an average person. It would probably be weird to see an average body shape doing the impossible stunts you see in action movies.

          • fidodo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 months ago

            Even with the lore explanations, I think it just helps maintain suspension of disbelief when you visually see someone muscular doing impossible feats of strength rather than someone physically unfit. But to your point, I would like to see more super heroes with strongman barrel physics instead of the aesthetic prioritizing body builder physique.

            • Khrux@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think Spiderman is a decent example of not being comically ripped but I always believe he’s as strong as he’s depicted due to his powers.

              • fidodo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                Spiderman is still super fit. He’s lean muscle and not bulky body builder fit, but he still has muscle. Even in the comics his muscles are very well defined.

          • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well, I don’t know about Thor (but he is a god short of and from an advanced culture ), but Superman received perfect nutrition from our Sun.

            There is that alt timeline story of Superman where he didn’t see the Sun and was captured when he landed as a baby.

            He grew up to be skinny and had severe malnutrition, was still tall and became strong as soon as he saw the sun the first time.

        • Hasuris@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Back when they made “300” it was almost satire how shredded these guys looked. It was obvious it wasn’t realistic and wasn’t meant to be. Nowadays we get shows like Reacher with an absolutely humongous lead that’s supposed to wander around doing jack shit all day… right. His mother shat him out this way.

          And female “tough” leads are often tiny and no muscle in sight yet they still kick ass and routinely dispose off bad guys twice their size. Why do the guys even need to be this big when physics don’t matter?

          I hate this so much. Hollywood is so fucking fake.

      • Bierjunge@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah thats totally true. Just look at photos of Bruce Lee for example. A fighting machine but not nearly as big as any one of the gym bros nowadays that train for volume.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Larger.
        Watch out, I had to battle a group of 6 foot tall toddlers the other day just to get on a swing set. Ankle biters are becoming 2nd floor balcony biters. It’s insanity!

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s very fucked up what people perceived has healthy now.

    I’ve been in fairly decent shape my whole life but the amount of people, especially women, that tell me I’m too skinny and that I need to gain weight. Even when I’m actually closer to being overweight than underweight. Or how many times I seen someone point to someone on steroids or fat and say that they are healthy.

    It’s got to the point where kids need to be educated. I wouldn’t even be against weighing them. If they obese then it’s also child abuse and the parents fault.

    People think now if you can see/feel ribs or have any muscle tone (while not being a body builder) it means you’re underweight. That’s how humans are meant to be built! Go look at hunter gathers tribes or any active person pre the 90’s.

    Shit even dogs are fat nowadays.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or how many times I seen someone point to someone on steroids … and say that they are healthy.

      Gym bros be like

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Gym bros normally know who’s on steroids.

        I find it’s normally girls that are like “just look at a chicken and walk past a gym once a week and you can have arms the size of your head”

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah that’s clearly not what we’re talking about here. Cortisol cream for eczema is a steroid, but nobody using it would say they’re on roids.

          We’re obviously talking about people who juice for muscle mass.

          • shuzuko@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, no one is mistaking my low dose prednisone for fucking gear.

            Although sometimes I do wish it provided similar benefits, lol. I get the downsides and none of the fun.

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        3 months ago

        How about we don’t, because being fat is unhealthy and also costs a lot of money to public healthcare and infrastructure.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 months ago

          Making it your business to call out people who are unhealthily overweight is counter productive. People know they’re heavy, people know it takes a toll on their health. Lambasting them will only exacerbate their depression and make their relationship with food far more destructive. Don’t be a dickhead.

          • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            3 months ago

            Generally, I’d say that’s true. But given multiple people have told I’m underweight when I was borderline obese (and I don’t do any weight lifting or do manual labor as a job) does make me question how many people know they’re overweight. Obese people generally know they’re overweight.

            The solution isn’t calling out individuals about their weight though or collectively shaming people for being overweight. If you want people do have better diets and exercise more, changing the environment to be more conducive for that will do much more. But making sure healthyweight and overweight people aren’t pressured into eating more by people who insist they are underweight is probably a good thing.

          • twelve20two @slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Exactly. We’ve got to treat the root cause of what’s going on, and that’s often an extremely complex challenge that varies from person to person.

        • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          how about if you actually crack a science textbook you’ll learn that body fat matters a lot less than whether or not someone is physically active and that losing weight isn’t as simple as just dieting and exercise and that giving an entire generation of people eating disorders put more strain on the healthcare system than obesity ever did

    • Dra@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Americans are particularly talented (but not alone) in this doublethink

    • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Are you skinny fat by chance? I have a friend who’s exactly like this. Bro looks super skinny to some but fat-ish to others.

      • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Skinny fat means being lean but having near tummies, legs and arms. It’s common with south asians like in indian subcontinent. It’s mainly caused by unhealthy diets us desi’s have.

        • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Wdym by unhealthy diets? My family being desi had quite healthy stuff, so I rlly can’t relate. Like do u mean oily gravies n stuff like they have in dhabas? Or generally low protein diets?

          • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes. A lot of desis eat rice, daal, etc and don’t eat much meat. All the oil in gravies and curries is also a thing. And most importantly, they don’t workout. So they aren’t fat nor healthy. Your family is an exception not an example.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        No I think I’m just tall and long with big shoulders.

        Clothes seem baggy around my tummy even with slim fit and my arms are actually legitimately quite skinny.

        When I take my clothes off I used to get compliments on my chest and shoulders also butt and legs. Weirdly sometimes also arms which I didn’t really understand.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    3 months ago

    But at this point in the film, hadn’t he lost like 15+ pounds and also shouldn’t soldiers be held to a slimmer standard than others? And yeah the movie was made a long time ago. Most people are actually fat now.

    • Oderus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 months ago

      He did gain 70lbs for the role so technically he was fat, just not as fat as some people are today.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah but my point was I remember thinking he got skinnier throughout the film, as though he was supposed to getting “whipped into shape”

        • zaph@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          3 months ago

          throughout the film

          It’s been awhile since I’ve seen it but I’m pretty sure this guy redecorated the bathroom in bootcamp.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ok granted maybe it was only a 25 minute period I’m talking about but there was a progression iirc. “Redecorating the bathroom” is the crudest least empathetic way I can imagine putting it

          • thefartographer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh cool! Like new wallpaper and tiles or just redid the backsplash? Either way, that’s mighty kind of him. That guy’s got a real good head on his shoulders.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Apparently nobody’s clothes fit after basic because you either lose weight or gain muscle.

    • Coasting0942
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Don’t know about slimmer but soldiers should definitely be carrying less fat reserves and moving with more muscle mass. Calories supplied in the field, and if the logistics for that break down then you’re not going to live long enough to starve.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      This was my thought exactly. The military has actual weight standards. So he could be fat compared to all his fellow soldiers, but not fat by normal standards.

  • Coasting0942
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 months ago

    Remember when everybody got gaslit into thinking Gunny was great at his job

        • psmgx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          3 months ago

          He rattled off a nonstop stream of profanity and insults for like 10 min straight as a way of training / demo-ing to the actor. Kubrick thought he did a far better job and left him in the role. Much of his dialog was ad-libed.

          The original DI ended up as the crazy guy shooting civilians from the helicopter. “You guys oughta do a story about me!”

        • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Nah, more like abusing his contact with him. If my memory doesn’t fail, he was hired as an instructor for the actors but he thought he could do it better, so he started sending audition tapes to Kubrick. Kubrick eventually got tired and watched the tapes and he loved it, so the guy got hired.

          Or maybe I’m just misremembering 🤷🏻‍♀️

          • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            3 months ago

            Hired to coach actors to act like drill instructors because he was a drill instructor. Turns out it was more effective to just have the former drill instructor act like a drill instructor. Turns out the drill instructor did do it better than the actors, and ended up being one of the most accurate portrayals ever put to film.

            • frostysauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              Except it’s not accurate. He played it as the worst example of an ineffective, sadistic drill sergeant. He has said that over half of that stuff wouldn’t fly even back when he was in boot. To make it realistic that Pyle would snap he had to be a truly horrible drill sergeant, so that’s how he played the role.

              • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                3 months ago

                Having been through boot camp I can tell you there is a big over lap between what officially wouldn’t fly and what unofficially does happen. He became a spokesperson for The Corps, even getting promoted after leaving service, of course he wouldn’t sully the reputation of the Marine Corps on record.

  • ZMonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s military standards and boot camp. It has literally nothing to do with perception. Look at drill for a fraction of a second while standing at attention and he will berate you endlessly for trying to suck him off with your eyes. Your bootlace is dragging because you’re dumb. You’re tired because you’re weak. And you are the fattest motherfucker in this universe because you stood in front of the cake in the chow line for too long. It’s not about perception. It’s just basic. Even in active duty today, he would still be considered overweight, and even if he passed the PT test it wouldn’t protect him from getting chaptered out for fitness.

    6’ 5", 200#, according to the Army, I was overweight by 15 lbs. I ran A group most mornings in PT (fastest, farthest runners), ran low 6 min miles, maxed situps and still had to wait 40 seconds for the test to end. Pushups were always low but fuck off, soy alto. I started lifting, gained 50 lbs, and my neck grew to 19"+ and all of the sudden I was “fit”, even though I couldn’t run A group anymore, couldn’t break 7 min miles, and barely finished the situps in time. No improvement on pushups so don’t stop fucking off. It’s just military standards. It has literally nothing to do with perception. And people were fat before the 80s, JTFC did I just have to say that? Sure, there are more today, but it’s not like Pvt Pyle was broadly considered obese by civilians at the time. The people ITT… 🙄

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure we had fat people back then, but it was nothing like how it is today. Now most people are fat, and that wasn’t the case in the 80’s.

      • ZMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        No, it was exactly that. When my neck taped in over 19, it was the first time I had ever not been on PT watch. I had to do higher frequency PT testing. It was dumb.

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 months ago

    Shit, have you seen all those fatass larping gravy seals out there at right wing larps? Some of them are so fat on their rascals it’s amazing they can even hold a gun and have enough strength to squeeze out a runny turd, let alone a trigger!

    Sgt. Hartman would have a field day.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      The ones on scooters are weak.

      But you’d be amazed how strong the ones who can walk are. Can you carry 250 pounds up a flight of stairs without significant effort? Because there are 400-pound people who walk up staircases every day without trouble. The fact that they can walk, get up after lying down, etc requires that they be immensely strong.

      All this is to say, don’t get yourself into a position where one may take a swing at you. They may be out of shape, slow, etc, but if they land a hit there’s a lot of muscle and mass behind it that shouldn’t be underestimated just because they’re unhealthy.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They claim “well-regulated” means “properly functioning” and not “subject to regulations”, but how functional is a militia of morbidly obese men with no combat training, no psychological assessments and no demonstrated ability to use or safely handle a weapon, who probably enthusiastically voted for the government that needs overthrowing?

      They’re children claiming they need a PlayStation 5 “for homework”.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Dude what about Chunk?

    That kid was fat for his time.

    Nowadays that’s practically median.

    Even 10 years later, Heavyweights was literally about really fat kids. They aren’t really fat nowadays.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 months ago

    Everyone back then was living on cocaine and cigarettes. That dude was just a little thicc is all.

    • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Born too late to die of consumption, born too early to be infused with microplastics, but born just in time to enjoy all the asbestos and cigarettes he could possibly want

    • anivia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      This dude was overweight enough that it was a health problem. Calling him “just a little thicc” makes you part if the problem

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Can you, like, chill? God damn.

        It’s a fucking movie and they wrote the character that way. The actor, Vincent D’Onofrio was in much better shape than what he made us believe. That’s what acting is, after all.

  • Swarfega@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Hell I like you. You can come over to my house and fuck my sister

  • Lad
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    YOU ARE A DISGUSTING FAT BODY PRIVATE PYLE!

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    In Bridget Jones Diary, Renee Zellweger has fat jokes made about her the entire film (because to Richard Curtis, cruelty to fat people is comedy) but she’s not even remotely fat.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s hard to remember that fucking everyone was super thin until like 1990. When the movie came out, the audience considered him to be huge.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 months ago

      No no they where not. I know it’s a shock but their where fat people before the 90’s.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, dear, but go find a photo of someone’s birthday party in 1985 and compare to today. The average weight has increased dramatically. If you deny this then you’re just being oppositional.

  • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think my kids are old enough to appreciate the jokes in Full Metal Jacket now. I got them to watch LOTR and now we started with The Hobbit. Star Wars next, but that’s a tough one, since it seems old to them, but maybe I’ll start with Rogue One since it’s the best modern star wars movie.

    • groet@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      Honestly it might be the best Star wars movie, period. At least from todays perspective. The original trilogy was groundbreaking for their own time but haven’t aged the best. As with many media, what was innovative 40 years ago is cliche and stale today.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            I suppose “aged badly” means something different to me: that something was socially appropriate at the time but is not any more, like overt sexism. The only thing somewhat going there is slave girl leia, though that scene ends with her strangling her oppressor. I’d say that’s at best a bit sexualized, but that’s nothing bad in my opinion. Sex positivity please

              • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Sexualization and sexism are not the same thing. The former is fine (for any gender, if the role asks for it) and the latter isn’t any more, which is also great.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        My only problem is the plot sucked. Like visually it looks great, but it’s kind of just loosely connected scenes that more or less copy the same story from a new hope.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I always hear that. I couldn’t get more than 30 seconds into the movie

        Episode 8 made me unable to watch the movies. But Episode 7 killed Star wars for me though - when it came down our entire department took a half day to go together

        I’ll never forget walking out of that theatre, the people who only kinda liked it were happy, the guy who memorized wookepedia was disappointed, then I shared a look with my team lead, who has been a diehard fan since the originals, he’s a big old school nerd.

        We just shared a look of despair and loss, something we loved died that day. We’d both extensively read the extended universe, and we’d talk about it frequently. I don’t think we ever brought up Star wars again after that day

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Solo is the only Star Wars movie they’ve released since the OT in my opinion.

        The rest tried too hard, but Solo had the YEEHAW which made Star Wars great.

        I know folks hate it, but it was fun in the way Star Wars (ANH) was for me as a kid.

          • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Was a great movie, I loved it.

            It was set in the Star Wars universe which I love, but my statement is more about the “yee haw hold on to your assholes” that Star Wars was before there was a Empire strikes Back even.

            What I loved about Star Wars is what Solo did for me

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      They will like it 100x better when they watch it for the first time on their own in college with their friends

    • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hope you didn’t make them watch the extended Hobits. I’m not gonna risk it with my kids - I’m starting with LOTR

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sci fi is my favourite genre. Watched the second trilogy of star wars when the came out and thought they were enjoyable enough.

      Was excited to watch the orginal trilogy because everyone went on about how much better it was than the new ones.

      Could not get into it at all. It’s boring as hell and I’m not even sure what makes it a good movie from a modern standard. Prepare to be disappointed with their opinion of it.

      That’s not to say I don’t like old movies. Alien and Terminator are great movies, 2001 is pretty good though long winded. And non Sci film like 12 angry men and butch cassidy are amazing.

      Orginal star wars honestly is pretty bad.

      • skyspydude1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Original Star Wars is “bad” for the same reason that anyone watching the Matrix for the first time is going to think it’s kind of dumb and cheesy as hell: Tastes have changed, and all of the tropes and groundbreaking stuff it did were copied and satirized to death. There are definitely movies that have held up better than others and stayed more in line with modern tastes, but I don’t think it’s fair to look back at an old movie with almost 50 years of progress and judge it entirely on that.

        • Wanderer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          The Matrix is great and I believe it still stands up.

          But either way what we are discussing is if star wars is enjoyable today. I’m not disputing if it was enjoyable in the 70s or if it was groundbreaking.

          There are movies where the special effects blew people away and did things that were unbelievable. You look at them now and the special effects look terrible and then the rest of the movie doesn’t hold any power because it was leaning on how good the special effects were.

          I believe star wars is in that category.

          Terminator 1 the special effects are shit. But it’s still a good movie.

  • OKaybin@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    People aren’t shoveling foods into their gullets anymore, they’re dumping truckloads into it and proud of it.

    • Demographics (She/Her) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Alternatively: Capitalism has robbed the working class of any time for exercise while simultaneously pushing food that is dirt cheap to make with artificial additives that lead to excess consumption.

      But that doesn’t fit the convenient narrative of “it’s all society’s fault,” which pushes all blame and need for action off the observer.

        • maniclucky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 months ago

          Clearly because you don’t struggle with this thing, the struggles of others are invalid.

          Capitalism is significantly at fault because it pushes more and more food, makes cheap (read: affordable) food severely fattening, and creates industries that prey on people’s insecurities and entices them into all kinds of disordered eating. To say nothing about the general decline of physical and mental health caused by unfettered capitalism that often manifests as disordered eating.

          But yeah, eating too much is the only problem. Thanks I’m cured /s

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Man shut the fuck up, shut up.

          A can of mountain dew is:

          • In America: 355 mL with 170 calories (0.49 kcal/mL)
          • In Germany: 330 mL with 95.7 calories (0.29 kcal/mL)

          Feast your eyes upon this and perhaps begin to question the dumb bullshit perspective that lives in your head.

          Yes Americans, you do deserve to be able to enjoy a soda without fucking your calorie intake up. Did I mention the german one uses real sugar and tastes way better, which makes it harder to drink in excess?

        • TommySalami@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 months ago

          As a non-fat person who doesn’t exercise consistently, it’s not that simple for the vast majority. There are a lot of factors including health/genetics and the stuff mentioned in the comment you responded to. I’m not skinny because I avoid meals, I’m skinny because I lucked out genetically and I really don’t have to worry about what I eat in terms of gaining weight.

          Also, avoiding meals is like the worst way to maintain your weight and you should stop implicitly recommending it. It’s just going fuck up your metabolism, nutrition, and ability to maintain your weight. Quality matters substantially more than quantity, and quality is prohibitively expensive for many.

            • maniclucky@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 months ago

              Quick guideline that’ll help you be more empathetic to the rest of humanity: other people’s experiences aren’t like yours. Their bodies behave differently, they have different socioeconomic statuses, their minds struggle with things yours finds easy and vice versa. So “skip a meal” is trivial for you and impossible for another. That’s why many different diets exist.

              Stop painting humanity with one brush just because you can’t see outside your own world view.

              Also: A chunk of human history where we skipped meals regularly also involved getting eaten by predators. Just because it was true in the past does not make it true now. Having access to calorie bombs 24/7 is normal now. And society hasn’t figured out how to deal with that. Some handle it fine, others handle it poorly.

            • Laurentide@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              I eat two meals a day. I drink mostly plain water, with some black coffee and unsweetened tea. I cut out soda over a decade ago and sweets are a rare luxury. I can’t afford to eat massive amounts of food even if I want to. So why am I still fat?

        • irmoz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 months ago

          Food deserts exist, man. I’ve been there. Living in a shithole area with no shops supplying fresh foods, and no convenient transport links to such shops

          You’re probably just gonna go to the overpriced shop and buy processed crap, y’know?

            • irmoz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              If processed food is the only option, how exactly do you “just buy less of it”? Eat nothing? Be serious, dude.

              • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’ve had great success losing weight and saving money at Taco Bell.

                Reading the calories and reading the body’s signals are key. It took awhile for me to separate the craving for flavors from the pangs of genuine hunger.

                • irmoz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Nutrition tho…

                  The focus on weight, specifically, is a mistake. Health is far more than just weight. Eating junk food is bad, full stop, and will cause issues for health no matter your portions. This is the problem.

                  Diabetes, risk of cancer, addiction, malnutrition, even mental health problems, all are risk factors on a diet of processed food, even so-called “healthy” diets.

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah yes, thank you for your single data point. That’ll be sure to topple this mountain of evidence otherwise.

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          it’s not hard to

          People who say this almost always refuse to believe there can be any nuance to situations beyond their own limited experience.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Is there anything in the world this website won’t blame on capitalism?

        There are plenty of working class people that aren’t fat and there are plenty of rich people, or retirees, or unemployed that are fat.

        Being fat is about eating too much and not moving enough. People at some point need to take some responsibility for their actions.

        • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s pointless blaming the individual for a global crisis. Something systemic is to blame. And it really is a global crisis, it’s just more severe in some places.

    • Duranie@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      Proud of consuming truckloads of food? I must have missed that memo. Alternative take - overstressed, overworked, and struggling to survive, seeking out any kind of dopamine or serotonin bandaid to make the struggle with bothering for one more day worth it. It’s not something people typically WANT to do, but it can be an unhealthy coping mechanism when options are limited.