• Scanzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s kind of a massive part of Lemmys design, so I would disagree.

      We’re going to end up with duplicate instances all over the place. That’s just the reality of things. Some of them will become the more popular versions and others will be abandoned, but there’s little point to complaining about it.

      • vinnythegooch9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I understand that duplicates will pop up from different people, just found it weird that they would create 2 separate ones themselves. It’s hard to find which one to join when both are similar levels of active and I don’t love the idea of having to subscribe to both and go to both if I want to see what’s being posted. I assumed it was unfamiliarity with how the instances worked but didn’t think about seeing if kbin or lemmy would end up being more popular, that does makes sense.

        • Openmindedskeptic@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s wrong with subscribing to both? Then you’d have both in your feed; you wouldn’t have to go anywhere.

          But yeah we also wanted to make sure to get the name in a couple of places. Didn’t expect our resignation letters & whatnot to go a bit more public and get influxes of users and all.

          • Jaarsh119@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m assuming seeing duplicate posts from the two all the time would be the reason why you wouldn’t sub to both. Unless there’s like some extensions or something that stop that kinda thing? I’m fairly new to this kind of thing so educate me if I’m wrong

            • Openmindedskeptic@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              They aren’t connected except that the same mods run them. We don’t, or haven’t so far, posted duplicate posts. So that shouldn’t be an issue.

              And then we’re also paying attention and when it seems appropriate, we will likely close down one and redirect traffic to the one we keep up.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s counterintuitive to the whole point of Lemmy lol

      Actually no, it is not. Having multiple smaller communities works to the benefit of users in the Fediverse. One server might be down, and people in those communities can find another community on a different instance to continue discussion until the community of their instance choice comes back up.

      • Klaboesterbeer@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        By that logic it makes more sense to have one community mirrored over multiple instances. If one instance goes down the others just take over. No hassle for the users.

        • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do think it would be beneficial if there was a way to have “super communities” or “sub-federation,” where communities with similar topics can opt in to the feature. Thus if a person subscribes to one of the communities with that feature, other communities with similar topics will appear in that thread.

          Ultimately, this would retain decentralization while increasing community discovery, which is a benefit to end-users.

          • Openmindedskeptic@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah people have thrown around the idea of eventually doing something like that. So like you’d subscribe to “AccidentalRenaissance” and get all communities with that name as one feed or whatever.

            Hope that happens.

        • Aphonefriend@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          But the point is to have different people in charge in case anyone gets full of themselves. See: reddit

      • Openmindedskeptic@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I think people are trying to force/recreate Reddit in its entirety on a single platform, and that’s not going to happen.

        And I didn’t think of it, but yeah having one to check out when the other one’s down is good.