Please vote on respective comments for results so we can see the results

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    As far as I know Tuna-fish is only a nth American thing and sounds very weird to my ears.

    So this vote will likely be Nth America vs the rest.

    Honestly, why only tuna fish?

    Salmon-fish?

    Chicken-bird?

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    All you crazy foreigners just don’t realize. 'Merica has no regulations, sense, or laws. We call it “Tuna Fish” because just “Tuna” is sawdust and cat liter.

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    I consider “tuna fish” to be outdated and regional to the South and maybe Midwest US. I grew up hearing it but at some point started wondering why tf we would say that rather than just tuna, so I’ve made a point to just say tuna since then.

    • memmypemmy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Huh, I grew up in the South and never realized it wasn’t normal to say tuna fish sandwich. I guess it doesn’t really make sense, but I still kinda like the ring of it

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        It is normal, I guess. I grew up with my mother and grandmother saying that. I decided it was silly and I should stop, though.

  • fidodo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    For some reason if I think of a tuna fish sandwich I imagine canned tuna, but if I think tuna sandwich I imagine whole seared tuna.

    • Badass_panda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      There is, yes … that’s the main Spanish name for prickly pear.

      Up until around 1907, your odds of encountering the fruit by the name “tuna” were about the same as the fish, when the first commercial canneries started to pop up in California… hence, a habit of clarifying between the two that stuck, even though most folks outside of the southwest had never heard of a tuna cactus.

      • theragu40@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Fascinating. I’ll add a slight addition of info that prickly pears are actually present in the Midwestern and eastern parts of the US. Saw them growing in the wild at the Indiana Dunes national park last year. Very weird to see cacti that far north, but there they were.

        Never knew the Spanish name for them!

  • Arin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Are there Tunas that aren’t fish? We just say Tuna here in California unless we ask for yellow fin tuna or blue fin tuna

  • daveywaveyboy@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    For the vote it would have to be “tuna”. But could you try and order less tuna, or none at all? Not only for the risks to your health, but it’s also really bad for the tuna. And there is no sustainable way to eat fish - not even tuna. Thanks.

    • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Curious, are you against eating animals at all, or is there something specific to fish I’m unaware of?

      Tried to phrase that in the most polite way, but I can’t get the phrasing to not sound like I’m being a snarky dick. I’m genuinely asking. I’m not vegan, but I do try to limit myself as much as I can given the diets of the other people I cook for. Also not a fan of fish in general, but I’ll cook and eat it when someone in the house goes fishing at the local lake or river. We never buy fish.

      • Wookie@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Not who you asked but I agree with OP. In my case because the way the fishing industry operates is adding to the problem. They destroy ecosystems, pollute the oceans, kill fish for their “magical” powers. Also there’s been many studies showing that you don’t really know what type of fish you’re actually eating

      • daveywaveyboy@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thanks for fielding the question Wookie. And May I say Dharma that was the nicest question I ever got (ex Reddit so maybe Lemmy people are all lively). Honestly, if you (and everyone) cuts back on the red meat that’s good for you and great for the environment. Fish is a global problem - we have overfished the world. There is a good film about it, a few years old now “Sea-sporacy” if you have time. You are already in the top percentage because you are thoughtful about what you are consuming. Cool.

    • eyy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Tuna is one of the healthier fishes. It has higher mercury levels, but unless you’re eating it every day you’re fine.

  • Badass_panda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    I order a tuna salad sandwich or a tuna sandwich, but I grew up hearing tuna fish… specifically in reference to the stuff that came in a can.

    Both were equally common years ago but over time, “tuna” sans fish has won out… likely because fresh, non canned tuna is very common.

    I read an article a while ago that theorized the reason for Americans calling it “tuna fish” was that it rose to prominence as a canned staple good in the 1940s, and many Americans who didn’t live on the coasts had never heard of tuna before. Its light meat, when canned and cooked, was very mild and chicken-y compared with the heavily salted, oily canned fish folks were familiar with, hence both “chicken of the sea” and the precaution of labeling the can with not only tuna, but “fish”.

    I think an alternate explanation is probably more likely… the 1919 Oxford English Dictionary describes “Tuna” as an alternative spelling of “tunny”, the old name for the fish (still used in a culinary sense in Britain) … not coincidentally:

    • Californians would also have been familiar with the other tuna… tuna fruit, the prickly pear.

    • Possessed of both a fruit and a fish of the same name, distinguishing one from the other when canning fish seems reasonable

    • The largest canneries of tuna (e.g., the one that ultimately became Chicken of the Sea) were all based in California.