• BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    2 months ago

    Some people will tell you, “Well ackshually it was for states’ rights,” but those states wanted to use those rights to enforce slavery.

    It strikes me as like the “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” argument. Like, wow, you’re totally right about the semantics, but at the cost of missing the point entirely.

    • Shanedino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also the people kill people thing points to a need for widespread free mental health services which they definitely don’t support.

      • acetanilide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        In my area, they say they support it but in the same breath will say they don’t believe in therapy or medications.

        Source: my very Republican family

      • netvor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        people kill people

        I know! Le’ts ban murder then! That’ll fix it!

        (oh wait…)

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly as a non american I always thought the point of that statement was that its not guns that kill people its the way you hand them out like candy with the barest excuse for any kind of safety evaluation that kills people.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, it’s the idea that people who are murderous will kill no matter what… missing the point that it’s harder for them to do that successfully if they don’t have guns.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The truth is that it’s not that easy to get a gun in the USA. It’s not difficult if you’re prepared and are eligible but there are some barriers that will keep a portion of people from getting a gun if they aren’t allowed to own one. The sad fact is, it’s way too easy to get a gun illegally.

        • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 months ago

          When I lived in South Carolina, I had a friend who needed quick cash, he had

          : 4 handguns, : a long barrel rifle, : a cross bow, : a shotgun

          He asked me if I knew anyone who may want to buy any of it, so I texted a coworker I thought might be interested.

          He showed up with around $1500 in cash handed it to my friend, packed it all up in his car and drove away, they didn’t even learn each others names.

          The sale was completely legal, and took about 15 minutes.

          In many states there are effectively NO barriers to stop people from getting a gun legally.

        • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          Dude. It’s pretty fucking easy to get a gun. You walk into a store, say “I’d like that one please”, they take your license and another form of id (literally could be a piece of mail), you fill out a form that says you aren’t a felon like Donald Trump, on drugs like Hunter b, a non-citizen, etc, run the most cursory of cursory background checks, and they hand you the gun.

          It can take like 10 minutes.

          Its harder and takes much longer to get your car registered than to buy a gun.

          The barriers are super low. And if you lie on the form, it’s typically not something people can check/vet and is only used after the fact so people can say “but he shouldn’t have gotten one,! He lied on the form!!”

          • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Its harder and takes much longer to get your car registered than to buy a gun.

            Totally depends where you live. New York has some of the most comprehensive gun legislation in the world. It’s essentially impossible to get a permit for concealed carry.

            However, it’s quite trivial to obtain a gun illegally, as one can see from the crime statistics. Even though your complaint about the lack of gun control is true in some states, it’s obvious that even the most stringent gun regulations would have little to no effect on the availability of illegal firearms, which are disproportionately responsible for gun violence.

            • jaaake@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              It should be literally impossible to get a concealed carry license anywhere in the world.

            • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              while it does depend on where you live, this thread started with a window licker saying “in the USA”, which sets the bar pretty low. I mean between private sales and gun shows - it’s pretty easy somewhere in the USA.

        • Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I can go to any weekend gun show and buy as many guns as i want from anyone there with no questions asked. It’s harder to legally own one in several states, but getting a gun somewhere in the US is easy, and if you’re driving back, it’s not like the police have a gun radar to keep you from bringing them home.

    • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly. The Confederate States’ Constitution explicitly mentions and regulates slavery throughout the document.

      It was 100% about slavery.

      Anyone who says “states’ rights” without mentioning slavery is either an ignorant turd or a racist POS.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        It is was not 100% about slavery. It’s worse than that because it was also about the fear of treating black people like political equals, and black men having sex with their pure white daughters.

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      States rights to do what? (⌐▀͡ ̯ʖ▀)︻̷┻̿═━一-

      People kill people with what? (⌐▀͡ ̯ʖ▀)︻̷┻̿═━一-

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      … and free states were forced to arrest and ship off people who’d escaped slavery.

      Conservatives don’t mean things when they say words.