• Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    They are taught about it from childhood and many of us don’t questions stuff we’ve learnt in our childhood.

    Education fails to instil scientific temper in them

    Lack of proper mental health awareness and support.

    • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      They are taught about it from childhood

      in one single word >> Indoctrinated

      OP this is why people believe in religion, and it’s nearly impossible to get them out of it, you can’t reason someone out of something they weren’t reasoned into in the first place

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I find this a seemingly straight-forward point I’ve never gotten a religious person to acknowledge.

        99.99999% of people follow the religion they do because their parents did. Not because it’s true. That Christian, that Hindu, that Jew. It’s just because they were told it was true at birth.

        If their religion was actually the Truth, why would that be the case…?

        • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I find this a seemingly straight-forward point I’ve never gotten a religious person to acknowledge.

          because they don’t see it that way, they have their own understanding of free will, religion sells itself as test ( for the most part ), if you pass the test ( temptation or whatever you wanna call it ) you’re qualified to enter heaven, so in a way even if you’re born christian or a Muslim you still going to get tested, so in their view it doesn’t change anything, but from our perspective, it changes everything because we bet that if their parents didn’t make them that way, they would never go that route on their own…

          99.99999% of people follow the religion they do because their parents did. Not because it’s true. That Christian, that Hindu, that Jew. It’s just because they were told it was true at birth.

          That’s why we must address the root cause of all this, which is religion, in Islam for example “Prophet” Mohammed piss be upon him, said

          “Every child is born in a state of fitrah, then his parents make him into a Jew or a Christian or a Magian.” (Agreed upon)

          As you can see, Mohammed doesn’t apply his own observation on his beliefs and because people glorify him, they will never dare to question his reasoning, which is also their own reasoning now…

          You can tell a religious person to criticise everything and everyone, and they can, tell them to redirect their critism to their own belief, and suddenly they’ll become intellectually handicapped

      • gaifux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        My search for truth in my early 30’s led me to study the world’s religions, having grown up secular and feeling like something was missing. But don’t let this anecdote or others like it get in the way of your logic. You’re doing pretty good for a hairless monkey!

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Even if they do question, it’s not like they are in a safe environment to do so openly. They have to be prepared to give up community, friends, family, potentially their physical safety, and a worldview that says exactly who to be and how to live to be living a good life. That’s a huge step.

      I know for a fact there are religious people going through the motions because the alternative is too frightening, just like people stay in bad marriages.

      • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I agree. The support aspect is very strong. Can’t go against it, unless you are lucky and/or skilled. Or very brave.

      • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        7 days ago

        Right. Throughout human history, if someone was cast out of a community, they didn’t survive. We’ve been trained through evolution to go along with the tribe because it’s unsafe to question anything and get cast out.

        • gaifux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Survival of the fittest. Evolution does not value truth or mortality, so for example secret rapists are a highly successful adaptation regardless of the morality of the action. If evolution is a correct model of reality, this pesky religion and moral agency will diminish with time. True progress. Maybe we can start counting the years from the big bang instead of that Jesus event or w/e!

    • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Education fails to instil scientific temper in them

      Islam used to be the forefront of scientific and mathematical discovery. Believing in god have nothing to do with science or math, it’s superstition, something that cannot be proven or unproven, it’s that irrational thought that make us human.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Islam used to be the forefront of scientific and mathematical discovery.

        No, Islamic COUNTRIES did. They didn’t achieve excellence in science because Islam benefitted science.

        They achieved excellence in science compared to Christian countries in large part because their religious authority figures didn’t stand in the way anywhere near as much. Not because religion helped.

        Believing in god have nothing to do with science

        Not true. They are polar opposites. That’s why scientists are disproportionately atheist and agnostic: the evidence based mode of thinking employed in science doesn’t mix with the superstitious and unquestioningly convinced thinking of religion without some SERIOUS cognitive dissonance.

        it’s that irrational thought that make us human

        No. That’s not being human, that’s being brainwashed and/or obedient to authority.

        You’re right that it’s irrational and that irrationality is an inherent part of being human, but the SPECIFIC irrationality of religion is learned and enforced, NOT inherent.

        • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          No, Islamic COUNTRIES did. They didn’t achieve excellence in science because Islam benefitted science.

          No one claiming it is.

          They achieved excellence in science compared to Christian countries in large part because their religious authority figures didn’t stand in the way anywhere near as much, not because religion helped.

          Not sure how much difference is by changing “Islam” to “Islamic countries”, because the fact still remain that Muslim make scientific discovery and excel in mathematics despite being religious. Again, no one claiming Islam benefitted science.

          Not true. They are polar opposites.

          You just contradicted your last point. Also science are not religion, how can an apple be polar opposite to orange? One can believe in santa clause and ghost while excel in science. It’s not mutually exclusive.

          That’s why scientists are disproportionately atheist and agnostic: the evidence based mode of thinking employed in science doesn’t mix with the superstitious and unquestioningly convinced thinking of religion without some SERIOUS cognitive dissonance.

          Science are a broad subject, unless they purposely went and look for god, which they wouldn’t find, there’s like a huge load of subject that doesn’t have anything to do with god. Also your impression of religion is like, wrong lol. There’s more to religion than just praising god.

          No. That’s not being human, that’s being brainwashed and/or obedient to authority.

          See? Human ARE irrational.

      • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Islam used to be the forefront of scientific and mathematical discovery.

        People of all religions have contributed to scientific growth.

        The average religious person and the person discovering scientific/mathematical stuff are generally different tho.
        Universal basic education has gained focus in many parts of the world, only relatively recently.

        I think improved scientific temper would obviously clash with many mainstresm religions.

        Presence of some supreme creator may not be proven or disproven, but I think the anti-evolution stuff and similar things in most mainstream religions would face more questions when scientific temper improves.

        And I’m not saying that non-religious people are safe from similar stuff too. Just that it is easily spread and maintained when you have a community on it.

        • Pandantic@midwest.social
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Presence of some supreme creator may not be proven or disproven, but I think most of the anti-evolution stuff and similar things in most mainstream religions would face more questions when scientific temper improves.

          And religions can evolve with this (or die from declining membership), as long as the leaders don’t stick to the “These actually scientifically proven facts are lies sent by the Devil” line.

      • kellenoffdagrid❓️@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Thank you, I think people often overlook how faith and scientific thought can be complimentary. In any case, for questions of religious/spiritual matters, people are basically just running with a hypothesis that works for them. As long as they’re capable of being self-critical and aren’t pushing their beliefs on people who aren’t interested, then it seems fine to me.