Trump’s defense team has moved for a mistrial over Stormy Daniels’ testimony

“We move for a mistrial based on the testimony this morning,” defense attorney Todd Blanche said following the lunch break.

“The guardrails by this witness answering questions by the government were just thrown to the side,” Blanche said.

“There is no remedy that we can fashion … to unring this bell,” Blanche said about the impact of Daniels’ testimony.

Blanche argued the prosecutors wanted to embarrass Trump and inflame the jury and was far afield from a case about falsification of business records.

“She talked about a consensual encounter with President Trump that she was trying to sell,” Blanche said. “We heard a completely different story.”

Blanche argued that the testimony regarding condoms, being “blacked out” and and the “power dynamic” prejudiced the jury.

“This has nothing to do with the reason why we’re here,” Blanche said. “How can you un-ring a bell?”

The prosecution pushed back.

“Her account completes the narrative that precipitated the falsification of business records,” Hoffinger said. “It is precisely what the defendant did not want to become public.”

  • DeepThought42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “I was surprised that there were not more objections,” from the defense team he added. “At one point, the court … objected, because there was no objection coming from the defense.”

    Either they are bad lawyers or they were strategically withholding their objections in order to file the mistrial motion. I fully expect this to be brought up again in an appeal, assuming Trump loses the case.

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Convicted defendents in New York stay in prison during the appeal process. But of course we wont see that fucking happen because money reasons.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Can they file for a miss trail on the grounds that they themselves didn’t do the thing that’s expected of them in the time it was expected for them to do it.

      Surely a lawyer can’t deliberately do a bad job, and then file for a mistrial.

      • DeepThought42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As far as I’m aware nothing will stop them from trying to do that. It’s up to the judge (or judges if it goes to an appeal) to decide whether their argument makes sense. While I’d hope that a competent judge will see their shenanigans for what it is, I have no doubt that someone has made that strategy work at some point.

        To be clear, I’m not a lawyer, so naturally don’t take my word for it.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s exactly what they were aiming for. It was their hail Mary because they know they don’t have an actual defense