• lolcatnip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    They shouldn’t respond with deadly force to the presumed victims of the attack!

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They are responding to the scene of a bomb.

      That’s not something you discuss, that’s something you dominate until the scene is safe.

      • lolcatnip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You think it’s acceptable for innocent people being threatened by a bomb to be harmed by the police who respond because they need to “dominate” the situation? What even is the point of the police when they hurt the people they’re sent to protect?

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          In this hypothetical, they are there to find a bomb, and bomber. Collateral damage is to be minimized, obviously. Proper training is what’s needed for that, which many police forces across the world lack.

          A negotiator is not what you send to defuse a bomb or disable a terrorist.