That probably sounded smart in your head, but it’s a different level when a judge rules against your ridiculous election challenge lawsuit while calling it “daft,” “ill-considered,” and "pointless.”
“Dr. Stein publicly announced that she seeks to promote election integrity,” the judge continued. But really, he argued, “she seeks to promote only herself,” adding that there was one other benefit from her litigation “that would not otherwise have been conferred: the payment of $150,000 to Stein’s lawyers.”
That probably sounded smart in your head, but it’s a different level when a judge rules against your ridiculous election challenge lawsuit while calling it “daft,” “ill-considered,” and "pointless.”
“Dr. Stein publicly announced that she seeks to promote election integrity,” the judge continued. But really, he argued, “she seeks to promote only herself,” adding that there was one other benefit from her litigation “that would not otherwise have been conferred: the payment of $150,000 to Stein’s lawyers.”
https://www.businessinsider.com/jill-stein-still-owes-fec-campaign-finance-penalites-2020-10
I can’t be bothered to summarize the rest for you. Read it yourself.
she was challenging the election of trump in that lawsuit. and yet, she is accused of helping him win.