Pokemon did nothing with it. It’s the same game but with a world map you barely interact with. IMO routes were better. At least routes involved navigation, gimmickry, and some sort of intentional journey.
IMO it’s most similar to TLoZ
Wouldn’t it be Supreme Leader Khamenei? I don’t know the political structure in Iran, but the infoshitter says he’s one step above president
Can the next COTW be Azerbaijan?
Israeli leadership, in Hebrew: “We are committing a genocide.”
Israeli leadership, in English: “This isn’t a genocide because we havent killed ebough people yet.”
He’s the comments section at Naked Capitalism
Moreover, we absolutely do have memory. The concept existed before computers and we named the computer’s process after that. We have memories, and computers do something that we easily liken to having memories. Computer memory is the metaphor here
My guess is because old movies and new movies can be monetized just the same, but new games have all sorts of rent-extractions built in.
Also old movies tend to be worth about as much to purchase as somewhat new ones where old games are expected at steeper discounts.
Finally, an old movie takes an evening to watch, where an old game can take much longer and deliver more value
Fun?! Nah, fuck that
The technology looks really cool, if nothing else
Tercios seem like they take a lot of coordination to manage
What do the 15th century tactics look like
The Dutch model has seen some success. Smaller, roving support protests that immediately disperse at the first sign of police involvement. Cops got spread thin and couldn’t envelop protestors because they couldn’t concentrate their forces enough to make arrests.
At the same time, these roving protests were a threat to police backlines that theynhad to respect.
Riot police are elite heavy infantry. They’re perfectly suited to marching in formation and being absolutely unstoppable from the front. They have seige equipment to limit the utility of set fortifications too. Protestors need skirmisher support
Who is the RFK Jr. in this?
“Ranked-choice voting”