• 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    304
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    90 days for trying to overthrown the government and verbally attacking the judge. What a fucking joke of a sentence.

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      239
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hey it’s not like he did something insanely criminal, like owning a negligible amount of cannabis to enjoy in the privacy of his own home.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        141
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        How about trying to vote with a provisional ballot after being told it’s okay to vote and then being thrown in jail because it wasn’t okay to vote.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          63
          ·
          7 months ago

          You forgot to add that she did all of that while being black. If she had had the good sense to be white, she probably wouldn’t have spent 5 years in jail.

  • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    7 months ago

    insulted a prosecutor and verbally attacked the judge who punished him.

    Sounds like a certain ex-president who deserves to have his eventual sentence quadrupled.

      • 11181514@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        7 months ago

        Contempt of court is a crime. Also I like how you lumped the judicial and executive branches into “political figures” like there isn’t a constitutional difference.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think the article makes it seem different than it is.

        He was going to get a lighter sentence because he was showing remorse by playing guilty. Then his behavior between the plea and the sentencing showed that he wasn’t actually remorseful, so they go back to what they would have sentenced him.

        It’s like if you get offered a discount on a bill if you pay early, then you pay late instead and have to pay the full amount. They aren’t charging you more, they’re just not offering the early discount because you didn’t hold your end of the bargain up.

        So, he’s getting the sentence he deserved without credit for showing that he knows what he did was wrong.

        Lesson for other defendants: the time to return to being an asshole is after everything has been settled.

      • subignition@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        He’s still getting less than four months. It should be a lot worse to reflect the severity of what he did.

        • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Article doesn’t really say what he did, but the prosecutors only asked for twenty one days so probably fuck all

          • subignition@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            7 months ago

            Why are you calling other people in this thread dumb for not reading the article when you haven’t done the most basic amount of looking into it yourself?

            Here is the sentencing memorandum from June (a few weeks prior to his sovcit outburst mentioned in the article, if I’m reading correctly) where the 21 day sentence was initially requested. It’s reachable in two clicks from the article, and it describes in excruciating detail all of his participation in Jan 6, as well as the broader context around his social media posts.

            He pleaded guilty to one of the four counts he was originally charged with, and the AP notes that over 400 Jan 6th defendants have done the same. It’s unclear from the filing whether a plea agreement was offered; I would guess that it was, and that this is probably an effort to reduce the overall burden on the court system, because a) there are over 1200 individuals charges with crimes in connection with the events of Jan 6, and b) there is plenty of damning video evidence of most of it.

            • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Gee, what a mystery why I’d return an insult in kind. You must be as brilliant as the other guy

  • tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    7 months ago

    This guy thinks he can do exactly what Trump does and get away with it like Trump seems to always do. The root cause must be fixed.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    7 months ago

    Insulted a prosecutor and verbally attacked the judge who punished him.

    The little guy getting an actual sentence out of it while cowardly judges refuse to toss trump in jail for worse.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      for worse

      I’d say they’re both guilty of the exact same thing, they’re just two halves of the same crime.

      Without mooks like this, trump was essentially just a loud angry nuisance, at least as far as the election goes. He could rant about how much the election was stolen until his face went from orange to blue, but at the end of the day he couldn’t have done anything about it.

      And without people like trump to rile them up, most of these idiots probably would have just stayed home.

      You need both halves of it for something like 1/6 to have taken place.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      These judges are playing a long game that people like us are too ignorant to see.

      Example; The judge’s ruling in Colorado that kept him on the ballot? Found him factually guilty of insurrection.

      No matter the verdict, this was going up the legal food chain. The next court has no choice but to accept that he’s an insurrectionist. Feel me? That is now an established fact that an appellate court cannot disregard or change.

      Fucking brilliant legal maneuvering.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        So what? Everyone has known that Trump took part in an insurrection for years and it hasn’t made a bit of difference. Unless you have a specific case in mind where that legal distinction is likely to make a difference then you’re just debating the semantics of “nothing happened to him”.

        We already know history will not look favorably on Trump. Solidifying the words future historians will use to describe him doesn’t make his election to a second term any less likely.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Actually no. The appellate hearings don’t have to accept the lower court’s findings and can ignore the opinion entirely to reach their own conclusions. Leaving him on the ballot creates a potential constitutional crisis. Consider the possibility that it doesn’t reach the Supreme Court until Trump has been elected.

        The best outcome is Trump is not the GOP nominee. Parties can set their own rules for primaries, but once he’s on the ticket, you’re talking about the courts disenfranchising a bunch of morons. And while we may all prefer that morons don’t vote, the fact is that the legal system that protects their right to vote also protects everyone else’s right to vote.

        This was a justice splitting the baby to try to keep both sides from attacking politically and physically.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 months ago

    What the fuck is this? I’m not one for cruel and unusual punishment but these people will be able to make another insurrection by the time Trump loses in 2024 with these sentences. What the fuck? The point is to deter insurrectionists, these light ass sentences won’t do shit.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Loads of the big guys are in for years. Sentences depend on what they did, I imagine this guy didn’t do much

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just being there should earn you 10. What would these people who “didn’t do much” have done if their plot was a success? No one there was benign.

        • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          If you were around protesting and not breaking any laws you shouldn’t even go to jail. It’s not be back or white

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            They were insurrectionists, they werent there doing nothing. As soon as they stepped foot inside the capital it should have earned them at least enough of a sentence to miss the next 2 elections. These people were here to usurp our nation and ya’ll were like “Nah some were just there bein’ chill”. Thats not how that works.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Hey I’m not Israel, I exclude the press by default. Someone needs to document this for high school tests in 100 years, thats the only place this knowledge seems to be used anyway.

  • ArugulaZ@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    I demand to have the convict extradited to Singapore, where they will add twenty lashes of the cane to the sentence.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I remember when the right wing was positively excited about the way Singapore does this for even minor infractions. The same bunch were popping chubbies over that guy in Vegas threatening to cut off the thumbs of people caught doing graffiti.

      Now the very same bunch cry over how these “peaceful protesters” are being persecuted for “touring the Capitol”, etc…

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Cool. Strip him of his passport and drop him off in an airport in Madagascar. Now he’s a sovereign citizen of that airport.