• Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m willing to believe that men hunted more frequently for this reason alone. Women are simply too valuable. I wonder if this is the origin of a dowry as well. Compensation for the tribe or family losing the ability to expand.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think you mean bride price. A dowry is something the woman’s family gives to the husband’s family.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Men were more expendable but the more important issue at hand was continued survival of the tribe. If we don’t have children we die out in 20-40 years. If we don’t have food, we die out in 2-4 weeks. If a woman was physically capable, she was likely going to be sent out on a hunt, more so if her family were hunters too.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re willing to believe that despite complete lack of any evidence for that?

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I would never quote it as scientific fact without scientific evidence, but it does withstand some scrutiny. Hunting is dangerous.

        10 alive men + 5 alive women + 5 dead women = 0-5 babies

        10 alive women + 5 alive men + 5 dead men = 0-10 babies

        If that isn’t evolutionary pressure, I don’t know what is