• Ashley@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hold the opinion that free will is not compatible in a universe with physics. Decisions can be random, but I don’t think the concept of “free will”, as every decision comes from the randomness of the universe, and outside factors. Not “consciousness”

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How does the fact that point of observation affects the outcome of the experiment fit into this? If there is no consciousness, why does it matter where you observe, as in the case of varying outcomes of the double slit experiment?

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The “observer” doesn’t have to even be conscious.

        I don’t believe in determinism or free will, though. The universe is full of random bullshit and nothing matters 👍

        • Ashley@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Consciousness is a side effect of the structures physics has created in our brains. We have consciousness because of the atoms in our brain that interact with each other in different ways.

        • Derproid@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Aren’t most philosophers unanimous on this? That the concept of free will can only exist in a world with beings that can act outside the natural world (i.e. god).

        • J Lou@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That doesn’t sound like someone who believes nothing matters. This would sound more like it:
          dfakjdsnhabfkjdhfjksdabckjadsbnvchievfbiq4rjwiofhewnJSABjaksbjakdbjbdahbDHBHabshbSHbhbHSBABHDBSHDBbhba