This vibes anecdotally with my local chapter. In the face of overwhelming membership solidarity with Palestinian liberation, the social imperialist reactionaries are purging themselves.

  • ikiru@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    8 months ago

    I quit DSA because it wasn’t Leftist enough.

    You quit DSA because it wasn’t Zionist enough.

    We are not the same.

      • jabrd [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        8 months ago

        It sounds like it’s moving left, though it also sounds like this has only been possible due to a mass drop in membership following the failure of the Bernie campaigns. Marxist Unity Group seems like their worth checking out as an internal bloc to the DSA and where it could go

        • NotARobot [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          8 months ago

          Funnily enough, the 3 he listed (Red Star, MUG, and Commie Caucus) are the 3 I’d most recommend people check out. Unless you have a strong preference for one of them I’d just join whichever is most active in your area.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 months ago

          Whatever the cause, it is opportunity to radicalized many people and take advantage of a local organizing apparatus (where applicable) to do good work for the community.

        • Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          They have had a drop, but they’re still massively above their 2015 numbers. This is just a natural lull where the opportunists and the less committed falll away.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      8 months ago

      Its the same way we’d phrase a prison break here in the US.

      The prisoners used violence against the guards, which is an unacceptable reversal of roles. The inmates that broke out have condemned everyone in the jail, since anyone might have shown them aid or even sympathy. The inmates are presumed dangerous, presumed deserving of punishment, and presumed less than human. Hell, its not far off from the way we described New Orleans residents fleeing Hurricane Katrina. Or Haitians escaping their own island prison.

      What we’re witnessing in Palestine isn’t far from what American politicians want to implement at home. That’s what is so fucking chilling about all this. Palestine is our future.

    • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Any time I read “Hamas pogrom” I mentally check out. Meaningless word salad. Pogroms cannot be effected by the people who are being subjugated

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, if Hamas took pains to avoid hurting non-Jewish whites or something like that, then there might be a real question of antisemitism. Or if they, like, greased their bullets with shellfish (halal but not kosher) or literally screamed “death to Jews” or . . . Basically anything inconsistent with simply lashing out in violence against the colonizer population, which is not what a pogrom is.

      • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 months ago

        Pogroms are enacted by powerful groups against disenfranchised, oppressed and weak groups. It’s literally impossible for Palestinians to pogrom Israelis, they simply don’t have the means

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 months ago

          I disagree with that. In the same way that a revolutionary party is functionally a state, if Hamas took over even one city block in Israel for a few hours and said “kill all the Jews, release the rest”, they are the dominant power in that time and place and are thereby not part of your logic.

          But that is not what they did, so it is a moot point.

          • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            8 months ago

            Hamas took over and destroyed settlements, because those settlements are illegal and belong to colonizers. They killed the people living there. It wasn’t kill all jews, it was kill all occupying settlers. It’s not a pogrom because they are being colonized and are defending themselves.

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              8 months ago

              You’ll notice I said “but they didn’t do that”. They were not targeting Jews, they killed and took hostages from among the settler population indiscriminately. That is what made it not a pogrom, not their colonized status.

        • Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, I think a lot of Anglos think South Africa was like segregation in the south, when it was a totally different thing which I want to say was worse but obviously segregation was and arguably still is a horrific hellscape and a permanent blight on humanity.

  • AFineWayToDie [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    8 months ago

    But they remained united in one overarching shared aim—to take a well-meaning, not particularly well-organized, and essentially social democratic organization still committed in practice to the original DSA vision of creating “the left wing of the possible,” and reinvent it as the mass vanguard party of the proletariat that somehow they had never been able to pull off while operating under their own banners of deepest red.

    Founding member of popular socialist group doesn’t know definition of socialist.

    Yup, that’s America.

  • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    8 months ago

    Amazing how this just hits pretty much every radlib talking point.

    • “we need to work with the Democratic party”
    • “the left wing of the possible” aka “pragmatism”
    • “Marxists are evil dictators”
    • Zionists
    • “Israel has a right to defend itself”
    • “Israel has a right to exist”
    • RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, we have to support the Nazis in Ukraine!”
    • Uyghur “genocide”
    • “purity tests”
    • believing the IOF’s claims of Hamas’s actions

    Also, you don’t have to read the article now, I just summed it up. Unless you really want to read about the radlib history of the DSA.

  • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    8 months ago

    Eat shit Zionist dog.

    This should be in c/the_dunk_tank. Entryism is when people join my org. Imagine the DSA being too radical for you

  • privatized_sun [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    ctrl+f “workers”, “working class”, “proletariat” NOT FOUND amber-snacking

    old-fashioned Marxist-Leninist

    You know who else believed that struggling with the contradictions of class society is “outdated” and not “modern”? The nazis

  • vertexarray [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    8 months ago

    DSA’s National Political Committee did not agree with the two most prominent democratic socialists in American public life.

    doesn’t really seem like a huge dunk on the DSA tbh

    knowing Israel@will retaliate- do you get that they don’t give a FUCK about Palestinian lives???

    damn silverman, what if the israeli military simply… didn’t retaliate? is it really solely on the prisoners inside the concentration camp to break the cycle of violence, even as that violent cycle is being continuously engineered by the guards?

  • culpritus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    8 months ago

    I started reading thinking this was someone that’s pro-Palestine upset about DSA being too pro-Israel. Pleasant surprise to see that it is instead just a succ-dem purging themself.

    DSA is getting better? Weeks where decades are happening?

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    8 months ago

    Anti-zionism seems to be the easiest fucking way to purge these losers.

    If you’re sus about any wreckers or feds or neolibs in your org, ask whether they denounce israel and zionism. It will quickly out any of them.

  • GVAGUY3 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hot take: DSA national’s statement is good because it condemns the killing of all civilians and still gets these people to show their asses. Seems like it may come in handy later.

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    8 months ago

    DSA, meanwhile, thrived between 2016 and 2020—because it proved it could win victories in the here-and-now, give-and-take world of electoral politics

    This sucks. Now don’t get me wrong, DSA has been able to get on some city councils and do some good work. But their main victory, the representatives belonging to “the squad” have all capitulated to Democrats and are at this point no different than standard liberals. Ilhan Omar did call Eliot Abrams evil to his face so that was kinda cool though

  • GriffithDidNothingWrong [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    8 months ago

    There were many eloquent responses to DSA’s all-but-explicit endorsement of Hamas’s horrifying atrocities… But the one I’d like to highlight is from comedian, writer, and actor Sarah Silverman

    Of course you would. What a fucking dork

    • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Where better for a political organisation’s founder to get their takes on a historically muddied issue than a dipshit ex-standup who does blackface, has demonstrated they nothing about the actual situation, and has called for genocide?