• Xanis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    They’ve done plenty with it. There have been a large number of positive changes. Lists exist in SO many places, go find them. Challenge yourself.

    Just not the deep changes in the system itself many of us know is needed.

        • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          Never said it was. Capitalism enables the conditions for fascism, the way to avoid and stop fascism is to remove the root cause.

                • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  That one’s kinda weak for learning why fascism is inevitable in a Capitalist system. Wage Labor and Capital and Value, Price and Profit both do a much better job of actually explaining the inherent unsustainability of Capitalism.

                  As fun to read as the CM is, it’s ultimately a pamphlet to radicalize workers, it isn’t really a solid overview of Marxist theory.

                  • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    Marxism is a fun thought experiment, but changing a system of government popularized by a known antisemite while knowing it’s really never been successful anywhere else, is not really worth the damage it would create.

                    And before you think to argue, maybe look into what happened to Bulgaria when they tried socialism. Hell… even Russia isn’t socialist anymore.

                  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 days ago

                    A lot of this writing has the same flaw that many other analytical texts have: great at diagnosing or discussing a problem and absolutely shit at coming up with any solutions to it.

                    The “what is the problem” part of the text is like 95% of it, then it’s “what we can do about it” is the remaining 4% before the author thanks his wife.

                    The “what is the problem” part is full of cogent analysis, data, and decent hypotheses and is well researched.

                    The “what can we do about it” is weak ass half-thought out ideas that never wind up getting implemented in whole or even in part because of their obvious flaws.

                    I personally think that’s because actually organizing people to do anything about any problem is infinitely harder than identifying one.

    • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      They’ve done plenty with it.

      You’re right, Biden signed an executive order making it illegal for a railway union to actually go on strike. And he kept a bunch of Trump appointees in positions where they can do the most damage. Like that dipshit who runs the postal service now.