• Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 days ago

    Remember when we all thought democracy meant we could have any leader we wanted, rather than a choice between a slightly slowed progression into the abyss vs diving headfirst into it?

    The lib I work with…in the same sitting he’ll tell me that no you can’t have what you want, realistically it’ll be this guy or the other guy, and then when I tell him we don’t have a democracy we have a monarchy with a choice between two political dynasties he’ll insist on ‘but what if the people want someone else’. He can somehow comfortably believe in two entirely opposing beliefs.

    • kandoh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s an oligarchy. You get a choice between three groups of oligarchs with occasionally competing interests and morals. Most countries are set up the same way.