• LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    In my view, there are two components to “religion”.

    1 - it typically starts with an attempt to explain why and how things are

    2 - it becomes a human administration - this becomes more about politics than “religion”

    Most of the problems with religion stem from the second part. I see the politics as the far bigger problem there. So people that want to create political movements around “science” are absolutely no better in my view.

    If you read the question being asked in this thread critically, do you find it a scientific question? A political one?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Human politics are always going to be human politics. Religion is usually just an excuse to do what everyone wanted to do anyway. Science is what happens when you inquire about how why and how things are honestly and thoroughly, though, so I don’t think the former is harmless.

      If you read the question being asked in this thread critically, do you find it a scientific question? A political one?

      Probably political, or at least personally motivated. I suppose it’s possible OP genuinely has no ideas, but I think that’s unlikely. I still stand by my answer.