• Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    15 days ago

    Hold up. The manual release, which these Musk humpers have been stamping their feet about and saying is totally workable if people would just use it, can damage the $30,000 car??

    lol. lmao.

    • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      15 days ago

      Various articles and forum posts suggest that using the emergency/manual releases can crack the windows. It looks like the door can’t/shouldn’t be opened with the window fully raised, and part of the normal door opening process is for the car to lower the windows a few millimetres.

      https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/threads/how-do-you-manually-release-the-doors-of-the-model-y.236856/

      Well that’s not good. There was a recent software update which does electrically pull down the windows incase someone manually releases the door so hopefully that issue is no longer. Unless the window Reg doesn’t get power which can be caused by a lot of trivial things (like the puddle lamp burning out)

      https://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-manually-open-tesla-door-if-battery-power-dies-2023-8?op=1

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      The windows normally roll down slightly when you ask the door to open itself. It’s actually been a thing for a long time on cars with frameless windows, you still need to be waterproof with the doors closed. So if you open the door with the window fully up, it has to slide out from the water proofing successfully. Depending on how tight that seal is, it might not be successful, the window might break. So they normally roll down a bit then open, and when you close it they roll back up to make a stronger seal.

      On older cars it was a physical thing that brings the windows lower when you pull the door handle. They could have retained that feature for the manual release, but I guess the added price probably wasn’t worth it since the idea is that you only have to manually release in an emergency anyway. So a small chance of the window breaking, like very small, is not a huge deal. If it was every single time you opened the door, sure a chance of breaking the window every day would suck. But for how small the chance is, and only in an emergency, it makes sense to want to save that money.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        15 days ago

        If only Musk’s super-cars that can drive themselves could master door technology of the '70s.

        This is fucking ridiculous. Electric doors have to be the stupidest thing in the world. There should never be a time where you can’t safely and easily exit your own fucking car. I can’t believe regulators aren’t jumping on this. Even if it’s rare it’s such a fucking own-goal that shouldn’t be a problem in the first place.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    15 days ago

    So there is a manual release feature but instead she chose not to use it and make a tiktok pretending she was stuck. How is this news?

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 days ago

    Can’t tell if shitty car or stupid customer but either way it’s about what I’d expect.

  • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 days ago

    It’s perfectly understandable to not want to damage a $$$ car. Tesla needs to provide better information on how to manage these situations.

    She clearly knew how to self rescue, so the whole situation was just bed communication and planning on Tesla’s part. Also, if things got more dire, she would have absolutely used the manual option.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 days ago

    The sontaran invasion of Earth is proceeding at an acceptable rate. Sontar-HA!

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 days ago

    While Tesla maintains its position as a pioneer in electric vehicle technology, the recent incident involving Janel raises concerns that could tarnish the reputation of Elon Musk’s company.

    lol

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 days ago

    Sounds like poor planning on the company and the owner’s parts. People die in cars enough that you should know how to exit the vehicle manually if necessary. The manual option should be obvious and absolutely shouldn’t be an after thought.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Also, lack of adequate regulation by NHTSA (although to be fair, nobody’s been braindead enough to want to design a car this irresponsibly until now, so it’s understandable they’re playing catch-up).

  • downpunxx@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 days ago

    Haha Janel it sucks to suck

    Every time you patronize Chick-fil-A, some of that money you’re spending is given by Chick-Fil-A’s owners, The Cathys which they use to fund violent and deadly “christian” anti homosexuality legislation in the third world, after decades of doing the same exact thing in the US, which sees LGBTQ in Africa, Asia, and South America tortured and brutally murdered just for being gay. They’ve been doing this for decades

    No chicken sandwich is worth the abuse and murder of gay people. Why don’t she know this, and if she did know, why didn’t she care?

    Hope she enjoyed the sweaty panic