“we have Dahir insaat at home” ass monorail

  • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    16 days ago

    Cute little gadgetbahn I can’t be too mad at since it’s trying to minimize new infrastructure. It’s basically just a PRT (ala Morgantown, WV). But the issue is the abandoned rails it wants to utilize are not going to be very useful routes for a PRT.

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      lots of abandoned rail is between still-connected towns, but the same reason they’re abandoned in the first place would still apply because they’re owned by the big rail monopolies. if anyone could’ve used them all along rural communities would’ve been utilizing them.

  • iridaniotter [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Some of this technology may sound a bit “over-ambitious,” but keep in mind the project was inspired by a fully functional self-balancing monorail that mechanical engineer Louis Brennan designed and demonstrated back in the early 1900s.

    Where did that bring you? Back to me.

  • itappearsthat [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 days ago

    ok fine I like it, it’s neat, this is the only good “not-trains public transit concept art” thing I’ve seen that isn’t full bazinga-brain. Turning a single rail-line into a two-way street is cool.

  • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 days ago

    because not everyone wants to wait for public transit or make a long drive, an increasing number of people are choosing to live in cities instead of the countryside.

    Just to note here, I don’t think that rings true. Germany is a very urbanized society by statistics, I mean it’s just dense, the furthest point you can get from civilization is like a half hour walk or something, but it is also incredibly sprawled out for european standards because the government subsidizes the single family home in the suburbs quite heavily. “Countryside” in germany is being like 5km from the nearest city centers and there’s only a few appartment blocks.

    There is an incredible amount of unused, but useable, railways just laying about the countryside that this could work for, I have one near me and it would be a very, very good public transport option, but honestly, they should just reactivate the fucking train tracks there and run trains.

  • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    why self balancing?? lmao just make a tiny autonomous rail car that uses both rails. This is dumb. Though I will say sparsely used/rural lines are probably the least bad place to try on-demand type systems, since even if they succeed wildly they can’t be a victim of their own success since there’s only a small manageable population to pull riders from.

    • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 days ago

      if it’s on one rail you could have them pass each other without needing to build a second set of tracks or relying on sidings to exist

          • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 days ago

            Oh God that’s even worse. Guaranteed collisions via an unnecessary slow-moving part that is assumed to always function correctly.

            Rail comes in pairs already so that you only have to build one engineered area, tunnel, bridge, etc. This is a bazinga idea.

            • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              16 days ago

              if you read the article, the bar is a safety mechanism for the prototype/testing stage and would not be in place on the production run.

              these test models are equipped with extendible “catching devices” that keep them from tipping over in the event of a mishap

              • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                16 days ago

                Yes I read the article and that ambiguous language doesn’t challenge what I said.

                This is a really bad idea. The kind cooked up by academic transportation grifters looking to take a pile of money from the government to do a bad idea with the right buzzwords. This is how the bazinga industrial complex works.