A Texas woman was awarded $1.2 billion in damages last week after she sued her former boyfriend and accused him of sending intimate images of her to her family, friends and co-workers from fake online accounts.

The woman, who is identified only by the initials D.L. in court documents, sued her former boyfriend, Marques Jamal Jackson, claiming he had psychologically and sexually abused her by distributing so-called revenge porn, a term for sexually explicit photos or videos of someone that are shared without consent.

The couple started dating in 2016 and were living together in Chicago in early 2020 when they began a “long and drawn-out break up,” according to the lawsuit. D.L. temporarily moved to her mother’s house in Texas and Mr. Jackson began accessing the security system there to spy on her, the lawsuit said.

In October 2021, the couple officially ended their relationship and D.L. told Mr. Jackson that she no longer wanted him to have access to what the lawsuit described as “visual intimate material” of her that she had allowed him to have while they were a couple.

Instead, he posted the images on several social media platforms and websites, including a pornographic website, and in a publicly accessible folder on the online file-sharing service Dropbox, the lawsuit said. He identified her in the material, using her name and address, and images of her face. He created fake social media pages and email accounts to share the material with her family, friends and co-workers, including by sending them a link to the Dropbox folder. On the social media pages where he had posted the images, he tagged accounts for her employer and for her personal gym.

The lawsuit says that this was still happening days before the complaint was filed in April 2022.

Mr. Jackson also used D.L.’s personal bank account to pay his rent, harassed her with calls and text messages from masked numbers, and told her loan officer that she had submitted a fraudulent loan application, the lawsuit said.

In a March 2022 email to D.L. cited in the lawsuit, Mr. Jackson said, “You will spend the rest of your life trying and failing to wipe yourself off the internet.”

Mr. Jackson could not be reached for comment. It was not clear if he had a lawyer.

He also did not appear in court on Wednesday, when a jury in Houston ordered him to pay $200 million for past and future mental anguish and $1 billion in punitive damages.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sounds like he was charged in absentia, so more symbolic than anything, sadly. I hope she gets some money though.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah. Sadly, the quote “If you owe the bank a thousand dollars, it’s your problem; if you owe them a billion, it’s their problem” applies here too. Hopefully she bleeds him dry and maybe some prison time too.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      11 months ago

      His wages will be garnished forever. He’s been sentenced to destitution forever. He’d be better off just leaving the country.

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m hoping he’s a US citizen so he won’t be able to avoid paying US taxes anywhere he goes without also getting a new identity and going into permanent hiding. As long as his life is destroyed far more comprehensively than his attempt to destroy hers, I’m happy.

        Well done that jury. This is not just about a very large settlement, it’s a very newsworthy settlement. It’s impossible to measure the impact on crimes that don’t happen but I reckon there will be a fair few potential perpetrators of this sort of crime who might just manage to get a fucking grip because of this. And a fair few victims who find a way to exact an entirely justified revenge on those who fail to grow the fuck up anyway.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          well if he was to leave the US and never return there’s very little risk in not paying the bills. it’s likely little would happen if you came back to visit for the holidays, either

          • JoBo@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I thought the US was pretty hot on chasing non-resident citizens for their taxes (and presumably garnished wages)?

              • JoBo@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’m not going to enforce it. It’s entirely possible that the US givt does not enforce it despite requiring it. But they usually only ignore taxes for very rich people, who can dodge them anyway, so I’d expect them to enforce it?

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        He would have been better off not trying to ruin her life and put her directly in harms way.

        Putting up naked pictures of someone with their name and address? This is a man who wanted her raped or dead.

        Fuck your sympathy for him having consequences for his own actions.

      • Hillock@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wouldn’t say he is sentenced to destitution. Wage garnishment is capped at 25% of disposable income. And you keep a minimum of 217.5 per week (30 hours of minimum wage a week).

        A 25% pay cut certainly hurts but depending on his income he could still have a decent life.

        The amount is ridiculous but even a more reasonable sentence around 500k-5mil would probably not change anything for his situation. Most people wouldn’t pay that off in their lifetime at 25% of income.

        • Backgammon@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          Iirc the 25% cap really only ends up applying if you have more than one active garnishment. Individual garnishments are generally 10% of gross. Maybe there are exceptions where one can go up to the full 25% of disposable, but it’s rarely the case.

      • Limeey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hardly - he has an SSN. Any job that pays taxes he’ll be garnished. Even if he manages to hide his identity with a fake ssn, his life as it was is ruined. Definitely a form of justice considering he literally was trying to ruin her life through these actions.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Probably $100-200 per month depending on his salary.

      It’s a bit like those cases where a defendant gets 54 life sentences + 100 years. Only in America.