• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    3 months ago

    Let them not be forgotten

    This is a large album of images from the protests in Beijing in 1989. It gives the historical context for the events leading up to the “tank man” photo, and what happened after.

    Warning: blood, gore, visible injuries, death

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ll never understand how the tankies can claim it never happened when there’s so many pictures like this available.

      • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Even Lemmygrad says there were 300 deaths. I really can’t find anyone saying it straight up didn’t happen, not even the CPC itself. The closest is saying that the massacre happened outside the square, which seems more of a technicality that both “sides” rely on to pretend the other is making stuff up. Ie, Lemmygrad claiming others know nothing because there was no massacre on the square itself and it all happened outside, while others see that as outright denial.

        Lemmygrad also believes it was CIA-backed and turned a pro-Maoist, anti-Dengist protest into an anti-Maoist, anti-Dengist, pro-Liberal Democracy/Capitalist protest, which I would say ultimately doesn’t change that protestors were murdered even if that was true.

        I think it’s helpful to see what people are actually saying, you can better argue it to be an atrocity that way. For example, as above, even if it was steered in a different direction by western forces, it still had popular support and as such was still an unjust escalation of force into massacre.

        The massacre is undeniable.

        • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes. They try and minimize it as much as they possibly can. I’ve seem them claim on here that nobody was killed and that nothing happened at Tiananmen square.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            The bloodbath happened on side streets, the square itself was cleared by intimidation alone.

            The one important name to know regarding the background and politics of all this is Hu Yaobang. Party hard-liners were happy being a faction of the party and struggling things out with other factions, students had the gall to very openly support the reformist faction, though, and marching onto the square in the wake of Hu Yaobang’s death would’ve set precedent that you can just march onto the square and demand basic decency. Tankies can’t have that, they gotta tank, and thus the hardliners took over leadership and reverted course away from the reformists for a decade or two.

            • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              2 months ago

              It was decided that “The-Side-Streets-Around-Tiananmen-Square Massacre” was a little too wordy

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I mean yes but no the salient point for the Chinese would be that the army did in fact not roll over all the students on the square, they “merely” intimidated them out of there after massacring themselves through barricades Peking locals had erected to protect the students. I say massacring not so much because those people didn’t right-out attack the army, but because the fighting was completely one-sided we’re talking pretty much fists and stones against machine guns and tanks.

                There were plenty of people within the CCP who wanted to see much more blood, that there was so relatively little blood is thanks to Peking locals (this time less militant ones) bringing rice and fried noodles to the army camping out in front of the city while explaining to them that (unlike what they had heard from the party) those weren’t counter-revolutionary bourgeois foreign agents on the square, but simply reformists.

                That’s why that point is rather important, the Chinese people might not be saying it out loud but “there was a massacre on the square” implies that the people did nothing to influence the situation. They very much did and avoided a much worse calamity.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Still they give counterfactual assertions the same way Trump supporters give counter factual assertions about their lame coup attempt on Jan. 6. “It was a secret plot by someone else!!”

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Interestingly, and having done a bit of extra reading, the current Western position is that the killings didn’t actually happen in the square itself, but in the surrounding streets as the army was pushing through Beijing to reach Tiananmen Square. Some of the initial reports that came out were evidently erroneous. Again, that’s internal communications in the USA acknowledging that. But still very awful and hundreds of people killed according to that version of events.

    • michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      I uploaded this pictures in my old Xiaomi cloud account. It took almost 100 MB out of 5 GB free space. Other 4.9 GB is taken by Winnie the Pooh pictures and memes about Xi.

  • HollandJim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Thanks for this. China keeps trying to wipe away this event by having any image deleted. It needs to be reposted and seen often.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve seen lots of pictures of Hong Kong protests, and hear about rent protests in Beijing, but haven’t seen many photos like this in Beijing proper in the 21st century. Are they that good at scrubbing the web, or did I just miss them?

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think they’re saying that, in the 21st century they haven’t seen many pictures of the event. Not that they haven’t seen pictures from the 21st century.

    • max_adam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      China’s internet is isolated from the rest of the world. We would be looking at a lot of content created from china if it wasn’t like that.

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Thanks for sharing. Every time I see a picture of the Tiananmen Square massacre I get shivers. That man is one of the most amazing icons of resistance against oppression. I like to think of myself as brave but I’m genuinely skeptical if I’d have the courage to stand in front of a tank that way.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ya know I dont know if thats legit NSFL or if im just that desensitized to war photos. Maybe giving 12 year old me a book on the civil war that included post battle photos and sections from a contemporary medical book with photos from the mangled corpses wasnt the wisest move by my grandmother. But ya know what those photos do invoke within me absolute fucken rage.

  • 1371113@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    This was the photo in my local newspaper when it happened. Source: local paper boy. (Was greyscale)

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, those horrible AI image generators of the late 80s look like garbage - most photos don’t even have colour! /s

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s odd, because that’s the photo I immediately think of when the massacre is brought up. I thought it was really well-known.

        • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Except that this photo is way more zoomed in. A photograph of a house from above is not the same as a photograph of earth from space, even though the angle might be the same.

            • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Even so, t’s off by at least some 45°. This picture was taken from way higher up (compare the position of the white lights in the pictures) and more to the left (see the ratio of the tanks side and front).

              • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                45° is a huge exaggeration. Yes, slightly higher up and slightly to the left, an angle that’s almost identical to the one OP posted, as I’ve been saying.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s pretty amazing how they let that guy just harass a tank for several minutes and even climb on it, then just kinda let him be led away by bystanders.

    For some reason growing up I think everyone assumed he got ran over or killed?

    https://youtu.be/qq8zFLIftGk

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      For some reason growing up I think everyone assumed he got ran over or killed?

      Because hundreds if not thousands of others were (others have already linked the graphic content).

      Also, seeing him being led away in this footage is zero evidence that he survived his protest (unsurprisingly, there is no documentation of him or what the government did to him, but considering what they did to others like him, there is very little room to doubt that he didn’t make it).

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’ll play devil’s advocate - the photographs don’t seem to show evidence of thousands dying, or even hundreds necessarily. Dozens, absolutely. I doubt we’ll ever know the actual numbers, though. Clearly something awful happened.

        Edit: I mean, they really don’t… and if they “only” ran over fifty civilians with tanks I think we can still consider that an unforgivable example of state violence. It’s not as if the Kent State shootings were okay because they only killed four people.

        I’m just saying, I don’t feel the photographic record is a particularly robust source when it comes to supporting those higher claims. That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen that way, just that the pictures are inadequate to prove that.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ll play devil’s advocate

          Devil’s one of the most powerful countries in the world, with people on this platform regularly repeating its propaganda, including in this thread.

          Not sure the devil needs an advocate in this case.

          • Syrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It always does, imo. Most of the time devil’s advocate isn’t meant to actually “defend” anything, but to find flaws/imperfections in your logic so you can adjust it and when you have to argue with an actual Xi bootlicker “devil”, they’ll have less ammo to refute your point.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              It always does, imo.

              Not always. Sometimes it’s just amplifying the devil’s arguments by repetition. Time and place, and all that jazz.

            • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The initial exaggeration was probably unintentional, due to second-hand eyewitness testimony getting relayed as fact in the middle of the chaos. But it was later used to pretend nothing happened, which clearly isn’t the case. My girlfriend is Chinese and has no idea anything ever happened in Tiananmen Square: she didn’t even know that date was censored online, so whatever they’re doing is working very well.

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          There are photos of dozens dead and tossed to the side like a garbage bag, both on the streets and in hospitals. Do you seriously think that’s the sort of thing which happens when only a few people died?

          • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I don’t claim a strong position. I suppose if I had to say, I believe the estimates of between 2-800 dead, mostly in the streets surrounding Tiananmen Square, with a dozen or so police lynchings amongst that number. But it would be weird for me to be overly attached to that as an opinion, as the evidence is unclear. I think Beijing hospital records suggest about 400, so that seems like a safe lower estimate.

            • Gabu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think Beijing hospital records suggest about 400

              That’d be the 400 they managed to find with their bodies in a good enough condition to identify. Have you seen the literal human paste?

              • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes, it’s a reasonable minimum estimate. What is it that you’re disagreeing with? I’ve certainly seen all the pictures. But have a read about the declassified diplomatic cables, it’s interesting. Notably, the mountains of flesh being burned with flamethrowers probably didn’t happen. I have no stake in that, it’s the current position held by the US Government. What happened is still monstrous.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    All of those tanks are just on patriotic vacation. There is no other reason for them to be there.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    ifyou believe the us version of the facts, thats pribably not the only angle you are missing