• FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
    43·
    3 months ago

    There is no need to kill anyone, yes even the settlers. Some may leave because they hate living next to Arabs, others can stay where they are.

    The solution they are suggesting, if Israel agrees (it won’t) would mean kicking out all the Jewish settlers in the west bank.

    Also making this about religion 🤦 ignoring all the Palestinian Christians who were killed or expelled.

    • YearOfTheCommieDesktop [they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
      32·
      3 months ago

      I mean you know a lot of those settlers will do stochastic terrorism and violently resist any integration. So they might need to be subdued, and I imagine it’d be hard to accomplish that without any of them dying in a shootout or something. Plus some of them are literally living in palestinians houses, no?

      • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
        25·
        3 months ago

        Yep and all the Palestinian towns which were destroyed during Nakba as well.

        There will be a need for a state lead housing project for all the Palestinians who were expelled.

        None of this factors into the ‘solution’ presented by them, millions of Palestinians live in refugee camps in the neighboring countries.

        • bbnh69420 [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
          12·
          3 months ago

          There will be a need for a state lead housing project for all the Palestinians who were expelled.

          For the Palestinians who were expelled and for settlers getting removed from stolen dwellings, correct?

          Edit: to clarify, I feel like I see people using home construction to dodge the issue of settler removal, pushing Palestinian refugees into hypothetical newly constructed apartment blocks while settlers get to remain in stolen homes because “it would be too violent to remove them.” Not saying you are, just explaining