Catherine, Princess of Wales, has been diagnosed with cancer and has begun chemotherapy, she announced in a video message on Friday, in which she described the past two months as “incredibly tough for our entire family.”

It comes after a period of intense uncertainty about the health of Catherine, who underwent abdominal surgery in January and largely disappeared from public view as she tried to recuperate.

Like the king, Catherine, 42, did not specify what kind of cancer she has, but asked the public and news media to respect her desire for privacy.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    No good reason for it to make the news, though.

    If objecting to this article is “heartless,” then what’s really heartless is not putting out headlines for every single other person who gets cancer. WTF did this person ever do to earn the recognition that everyone else hasn’t?

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      They haven’t done anything. They are just celebrities, which is why they are in the news. You may find celebrity culture stupid (as I do) but that’s how our society is. Are you equally upset with the news reporting on a random musician with cancer?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Exactly my point: society is wrong. Thinking that this person is somehow more deserving of attention – let alone sympathy – just because she’s “royal” is fucking perverse!

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Thinking they don’t deserve any when they have fucking cancer is probably a bit more perverse.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            So, again, where are the headlines for everyone else who has cancer? Are you saying they’re less deserving?

            • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I don’t understand what your argument is. Obviously we can’t report on or care about every single person on the planet, regardless of how deserving they may be.

              There is only room in our attention span for the occasional placeholder to care about outside our immediate social circle and family, and we are also naturally inclined to the concept of fame.

              So there will always be people of a certain fame who draw the attention of the masses. May it be politicians, celebrities, fucking billionaire scum, scientists, “influencers”, and so forth.

              I still don’t think it is morally appropriate to dismiss or talk bad about someone who is struggling with a potentially terminal illness, regardless of if they are famous or not.

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I still don’t think it is morally appropriate to dismiss or talk bad about someone who is struggling with a potentially terminal illness

                Then the media should STFU about it, don’t you think?

                Apparently there are a bunch of sycophants around here who can’t tell the difference between me saying something isn’t newsworthy and me being “heartless” towards a cancer patient. That’s just fucked-up on their part.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      what’s really heartless is not putting out headlines for every single other person who gets cancer.

      Who wants that? Do you? I don’t. If I get cancer I want to be left the fuck alone.