• BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    2 months ago

    Liking an OS isn’t a personality trait, but evangelizing for Free and Open Source Software which generally has no budget for advertising is a noble cause.

      • Iapar@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is it the same Person every time though?

        I mean if you come into a community which has a leaning it is just a natural consequence to get confronted with that leaning more then somewhere else, isn’t it?

        Like going into a Bible circle and saying that every other comment is about god which borders on obsession. I mean yes maybe but it is not surprising.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe the good people on Lemmy are already quite familiar with Free and Open Source Software though …

      • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean… you choose to read posts and comments here. You can choose to stop reading comments about Linux.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          This isn’t on Linuxmemes, it is on shitposts.

          So even if I wanted to block all Linux stuff, I would still get bombarded.

        • daltotron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          The problem is that I don’t know whether or not it’s gonna be worthwhile until I read the comment, and by that point, it’s already too late, because I’ve already read it.

          • shoop@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I was just gonna say … how the hell are you supposed to know the comment/post topic before you read it?

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, yes we are. Most of us love Linux, but we’re not in love with Linux…

        I really hope the fanboys can understand. We just… We don’t see it the way you do. Sorry.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          2 months ago

          “I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Android, is in fact, GMS/Android, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Google plus Android. AOSP is not an ecosystem unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Google ecosystem made useful by Google Play Services, monetization models, and mandatory telemetry components comprising a full OS as defined by Alphabet.”

  • OneLemmyMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux.

  • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I saw a post last night of a dude lamenting how difficult installing Windows was and listed a bunch of problems I find absolutely absurd. You’re telling me you know how to remedy driver issues in Linux, but can’t figure out how to in modern Windows, which does it automatically?

    There are plenty of things wrong with Windows that you don’t need to make shit up.

    • spikespaz@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      In my experience, windows always gets something wrong with drivers and I have to go do some stupid shit to fix it. And then later fight windows update as it tries to override my fix. Windows problems are rarely immediately apparent, whereas Linux problems usually are.

      • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 months ago

        Was your last experi nice with Windows with Vista or something? 7,8,10,11 have all been almost entirely work free for installing any hardware that isn’t exotic or boutique stuff.

        I am not one of the people weighing in based on an arbitrary experience or a small sample set. I’ve installed Windows literally tens of thousands of computers. The only thing can think of in the last 10 years I needed to find a driver for is some USB barcode scanners that emulate serial devices, and the driver for an android phone to be able to flash the boot loader.

        Every device that a computer actually needs to run just work.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Windows 10 once had the brilliant idea of de-installing the AMD graphics drivers and replacing it with its own while I was playing a game.

          Best AMD can do is show you a message box, it’s been going on for years and years and Microsoft doesn’t look willing to fix their shit. It’s possible to tell windows update to not overwrite “third-party” drivers, but only for all devices, not specific ones. Meanwhile it shouldn’t be doing that shit in the first place.

          Windows install once barfed a rescue partition on a disk that it thought was empty, even though I had specifically told it to install to a completely different disk. Ever since then I unhook all drives that aren’t the install drives before launching the thing.

          The overall theme with windows is that if it works, it works, if it doesn’t, you’re fucked. And just a centimetre off the beaten path nope, it doesn’t work.

        • exampleA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          even on Windows 10/11, I’m still frequently hearing about issues at work where the necessary ssd drivers are only included in the default windows installer (not the recovery shipped with the device) like half a year later. at least with Dell this seems to be a common theme.

          • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            only included in the default windows installer (not the recovery shipped with the device)

            That would be an OEM issue, not Microsoft. They’re supposed to modify the recovery image with whatever it needs, Windows doesn’t just do it automatically.

            • exampleA
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              The OEM version is working fine, as the drivers are embedded there. My point was that without this recovery partition you tend to run into issues on newer devices, as the MS bundled drivers get updated only infrequently.

              • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yeah that checks out. I constantly have to chase down drivers when doing Windows installs. The way I read your upper comment was the issue being with the recovery partition.

      • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        I haven’t had driver problems in forever, unless I’m using some old weird device that I haven’t used in ages. And even then usually going into device manager and telling it what kind of device the unknown device is usually fixes it.

        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          What are you doing to them?

          Something most people don’t do. It’s like how Apple can often hold your hand so hard that you can’t leave their preferred path. Windows lets you think it will let you stray without a fight. In niche cases it doesn’t.

        • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I irreversibly broke my Windows 10 install by changing permissions in the Microsoft Store folders while trying to use WSL.

            • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              All you have to do is change the ownership of all the files in the stores installed folders to yourself instead of the system then the desktop doesn’t load up properly anymore.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You’re telling me you know how to remedy driver issues in Linux, but can’t figure out how to in modern Windows, which does it automatically?

      Honestly? Yes.

      Windows tries to do a bunch of shit automagickally, but when the process fails it’s a nightmare to diagnose and manually fix. Linux is more rudimentary but also much more transparent. Once you know what you need to do, it’s very easy to see where you went wrong.

      • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’ve used Linux and Windows about equally. Windows is way less of a hassle. Unless you need a super specialized environment or are running a server, the hoops you need to go through on Linux to do a lot of otherwise simple things aren’t worth it.

        • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Your experience here is what I mean. You have used Windows a lot, so you understand how it all works. I don’t.

          I struggled to find drivers for obscure hardware under Windows. If there are no modules, no git repo, it can be confusing where to get them. I found a bunch of sketchy looking websites that claimed they had the drivers, but no obvious way to safely install them. I still don’t know the proper way to do it.

          I am familiar with Linux, so I know I need to find modules that I can compile against my kernel. 9 times out of 10 it’s effortless for me.

    • Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Let’s just be clear that Windows is a king of newer hardware and Linux is a king of older one, if we strictly take a driver-bullshit-o-meter.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 months ago

    *shrugs

    The Personal is Political.

    Especially in regards to Linux, which with many of the most vocal adherents doing so because they reject corporate control over their lives and want to see the rest of the world do so as well. It is very much a political issue to them, and so it’s not surprising that you see it crop up just as much as politically oriented posts, because the Linux-posting is essentially the same thing. It’s “politics” for the nerd-set. Same with piracy. Some people involved with these have deep anti-corporate and anti-capitalist philosophical roots for their reasons behind why they live like that, and they’re often not afraid to “preach” it to others.

    So yeah, shitposts sadly aren’t going to stop it anytime soon.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s “politics” for the nerd-set.

      Frankly, freedom of computation (basically, property rights as applied to electronics) is politics for everyone; it’s just that normies don’t understand how important it is.

    • daltotron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      You know, it’s kind of interesting, because I kind of wonder, and I’m sure someone could educate me to, the differences between philosophical outlooks that drive these different ideals.

      If you were like, a windows or mac purist, you’d maybe just be gunning for as much mass adoption as possible, meaning that you have as much interoperability, or, accessibility, as possible, and maybe you’re just biting the bullet in terms of like, corporate shenanigans and control. Basically you’d just be like, admitting defeat, to some extent, it’d be a compromise ideology. It’s sort of like the same ideology that pushes one big centralized set of servers for everything, compared to everyone running their own little instances. Sure, you’re getting a lack of security, lack of flexibility, and thus, potentially, the functionality of the app ends up sucking depending on what you’re doing, yadda yadda. But in return, you get mass adoption. This is kinda flip-flopped with like, Linux purism, right? And then the natural use cases and market adoption for it tends to just be the more niche uses, that demand such flexibility.

      So, which is more important for free access. Actual legal freedom, which even works itself into the structure of the app itself, right, or just, straight mercenary mass adoption, under any means necessary? I dunno.

      On one hand, within the current structure of the economy and political landscape, globally, it’s kind of impossible to achieve mass adoption with Linux, and I think mass adoption of it is almost kind of antithetical to the anarchism of the project itself, as is mass adoption of most anarchist political projects. It’s just kind of impossible to win in a head-to-head competition with larger corporations, or with more short-term gains focused ideologies.

      I’m still just running windows 10 LTSC with MAS, and it works fine for me, so that’s obviously where my ideological line is kind of threaded, just having everybody have the best free version of windows, maybe with some sort of increased privacy modifications to cut down on telemetry and shit like that, but I kinda doubt people could actually do that without destroying the usability of the system like all of those tend to do, or else someone would’ve probably done it by now.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      What, you don’t like a handful of private mega-corps decimating the groundwater reserves of the upper Midwest so that some dorks can try and scam Amazon with fake books?

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I especially don’t like how discourse can be poisoned and diluted by some chatbots in favor of military operations.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          We need chatbots to bombard all our social media feeds with pro-western military propaganda. Otherwise, Putin and Wumao and Evil Korea and The Muslim Horde and Drumpf will win.

        • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          One of my favorite moments like this was a Reddit thread where some account was pretending to be human and arguing with people in favor of the CEO’s actions during The Purge. Then one person asked it a question about making some dangerous thing or other, and it starting replying with things like “As an AI model, I cannot explain how to do that.” and stuff. It was great.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yet calling the simple rules that govern video game enemies AI is not controversial. Since when does AI have not to be fake to be called that?

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Good point, however, thinking about it, I would consider those rules to be closer to AI than LLMs, because there are logical rules based on “understanding” input data. As in “using input data in a coherent way that imitates how a human would use it”. LLMs are just sophisticated examples of the dozen of monkeys with typewriters that eventually come up with the works of Shakespeare out of pure chance. Except that they have a bazillion switches to adapt and are trained on desired output, and then the generated output is formed with some admittedly impressive grammar filters to impress humans. However, no one can explain how the result came to pass (with traceable exceptions being the material of ongoing research), and no one can predict the output for a not yet tested input (or for identical input after the model has been altered, regardless how little). Calling it AI is contributing to manslaughter, as evidenced by e.g. Tesla “autopilot” murdering people. PS: I know Tesla’s murder system is not an LLM, but it’s a very good example how misnoming causes deaths. Obligatory fuck the muskrat

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      The techbros who are into AI just want to own things without putting in the work. They want to sell you AI generated images as Art and puff up their SEO with LLM chatbots.

      FOSS is the opposite of that.

    • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m sorry to hear you’re frustrated. As an AI, my job is to assist and provide you with the information or help you need. Please feel free to let me know how I can better assist you, and I’ll do my best to address your concerns.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Technically the technology is open to the public but regular people cannot afford to implement it.

        The thing that makes Large Language Models hardly functional is scaling up their databases and processing power of one of several of their small models with specialized tasks. One model creates output from input, another model checks it for accuracy/coherency, a third model polices it for things that are not allowed.

        So unless you’ve got a datacenter and three high powered servers with top-grade cooling systems and a military grade power supply, fat fucking chance.

        • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I can run a small LLM on my 3060, but most of those models were originally trained on a cluster of a100s (maybe as few as 10, so more like one largish server than one datacenter)

          Bitnet came out recently and is looking like it will lower these requirements significantly (essentially training a model using ternary numbers instead of floats to reduce requirements, which turns out to not lower the quality that significantly)

        • OozingPositron@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Basically Mistral, check /lmg/ in /g/, if you have a GPU newer than 2 years you can probably run a 32B quantised model.

        • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Haha try the entire datacenter.

          If LLM was practical on three servers everyone and their mum would have an AI assistant product.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Did you know you could’ve made this meme on the FREE, OPEN-SOURCE image editor GIMP? Available now on Linux!

  • lugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just admit that you are paid by Big Open Source and move on to your next sponsor Air Up

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 months ago

    I will have you know my entire online persona on Lemmy is basically a 24/7 “Barbie” movie advertisement, thank you very much.

    I use Arch BTW.

  • PatMustard@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 months ago

    What is an “online persona”? Stop trying to turn my tech support forum into Facebook!

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Your persona is your personal “brand,” your representation of yourself within The Spectacle.

        The spectacle is not a collection of images, but a social relation among people, mediated by images.

        -Guy Debord

        Debord was right on, but I doubt even he predicted us mediating our own images, becoming increasingly directly part of The Spectacle.

        Full Disclosure: My real name is not Snot Flickerman.

        Related: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/02/black-ops-how-hbgary-wrote-backdoors-and-rootkits-for-the-government/4/

        In June 2010, the government was expressing real interest in social networks. The Air Force issued a public request for “persona management software,” which might sound boring until you realize that the government essentially wanted the ability to have one agent run multiple social media accounts at once.

        It wanted 50 software licenses, each of which could support 10 personas, “replete with background, history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturally and geographically consistent.”

        The software would allow these 50 cyberwarriors to peer at their monitors all day and manipulate these 10 accounts easily, all “without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries.” The personas would appear to come from all over the world, the better to infiltrate jihadist websites and social networks, or perhaps to show up on Facebook groups and influence public opinion in pro-US directions.

        There’s a whole slew of software aimed at creating numerous sockpuppet accounts that is called “Persona Management Software.” It’s certainly the word the US government uses to describe an online identity.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hey the Linux community is active so they show up on All. Same thing with video game communities, it’s a reflection of the interests of those who populate Lemmy. I don’t care for either but we gotta start someplace. IMO it’s largely due to the concept of the fediverse and instances and not simply an app you sign up to. FWIW, I barely get it. Folks here seem to be a tech savvy bunch

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      They accost posts en mass that have nothing to do with Linux CONSTANTLY. It’s actually really, really obnoxious, and it’s absolutely chasing people away from this platform.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think it’s mostly because the people who use linux are the people who are interested in free and open source software, which Lemmy also is.