Did automobiles replacing horses, diminishing horse population, diminishing horse suffering – as a consequence of work forced upon the animals. Is that moral win for horses; less suffering? Although their population is vastly smaller than 130 years ago.

  • Piece_Maker@feddit.ukEnglish
    1·
    4 months ago

    They’re “self driving” in the worst possible way - they can run off on their own and do whatever they want, and have little understanding of the rules of the road. People already freak out when a robotaxi takes an inadvertent wrong turn, horses can freak out and try to kill pedestrians.

    Ah yes because no one has ever “”“accidentally lost control”“” of their car and smashed something/someone to pieces with it!

    I’d take the mounds of horse shit on the streets over the disgusting stench of cars any day. At least I can scoop some up and spread it on my garden.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      7·
      4 months ago

      I’d take the mounds of horse shit on the streets over the disgusting stench of cars any day.

      No you would not.

      Excerpt:

      New York, which at the time was estimated to be the home of 150,000 horses, was targeted as well. The 15 to 30 pounds of manure produced daily by each horse multiplied by the number of horses in New York city resulted in more than three million pounds of horse manure per day that somehow needed to be disposed of. That’s not to mention the daily 40,000 gallons of horse urine.

      • cqthcaOP
        2·
        4 months ago

        Car sentience Rule #1: Don’t let the Humans know you are sentient.

    • SecretPancake@feddit.de
      3·
      4 months ago

      disgusting stench of cars

      Good thing there is already a solution for that in the form of electric cars. But too many people prefer stinky and loud cars for some reason.