• Philolurker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    11 months ago

    It opens a separate session in the browser and prevents saving any cookies, history or other state locally when you close it. Doesn’t change a blessed thing on the other end of the connection.

    • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      Most browsers even tell the users that, very clearly. I hate Google with a burning passion, but this lawsuit is just dumb.

      • jeansburger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        To be fair most of the class action lawsuits these days are “dumb.” It’s important to still fight these or else nothing will change. It’s a check valve on businesses and the government to prevent them from being completely unaccountable and harming entire populations of people.

        They named the feature incorrectly, then they only updated the language and explained it properly after people got in trouble or hurt because they thought it meant something different. That to me sounds like malice or at least negligence to me.

        Yes the suit sounds dumb initially. However if you think about how the average person might have been misled this does sound like Google needs to be held accountable.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also in the past I’ve observed that the Google indexing bot will visit a site right after a Chrome user visits the site. So if Googlebot knows nothing about abc123.com and then a Chrome user visits it, then suddenly Googlebot is crawling the site. I wonder if that happens when the Chrome user is in incognito mode?