This is the best summary I could come up with:

On Monday, a California judge denied Google’s request for summary judgment in a lawsuit filed by users alleging the company illegally invaded the privacy of millions of people.

The people suing Google say that occurred because Google’s cookies, analytics, and tools in apps continued to track internet browsing activity even after users activated Incognito mode Chrome, or other similar features like Safari’s private browsing expecting a certain level of privacy.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers pointed to statements in the Chrome privacy notice, Privacy Policy, Incognito Splash Screen, and Search & Browse Privately Help page about how incognito mode limits the information stored or how people can control the information they share, writing, “Taken as a whole, a triable issue exists as to whether these writings created an enforceable promise that Google would not collect users’ data while they browsed privately.”

Finally, given the nature of Google’s data collection, the Court is satisfied that money damages alone are not an adequate remedy.

Injunctive relief is necessary to address Google’s ongoing collection of users’ private browsing data.”

The lawsuit was filed in 2020, seeking “at least” $5 billion in damages, and as reported by Mike Swift for MLex, the ruling was not entirely surprising, as the judge had indicated she’d do so, but it is a big one as it moves the case closer toward settlement or a trial.

I’m a bot and I’m open source!

Aw, gee. They only made $60 billion last year. How will the company survive with a $5 billion judgement?

Seriously, fine. The. People. Fining the company is merely the cost of doing business. Hold the decision-makers financially accountable, or better yet put the assholes in prison if you want to curb this shit.