• Shrek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am not sure that this really changes focus all that much. Sounds like there were only about 50 people working on swtor, and they are mostly sending them to Broadsword, so it isn’t like they are redirecting them to work on their other properties. I guess it frees up some budget for other things, but my understanding was that the old republic was mostly self sustaining (or it probably would have been shut down years ago).

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This might be a good thing all around. Bioware needs to focus on DA and ME, they need love and attention to not have another ME:A or Anthem.

    In addition 3rd party studios are usually trying hard to prove themselves, depending on the relationship it could end up great. Fallout:NV of course is a great example of a studio handing IP over to a third party.

    Then there’s Grove Street Games, so who knows

    • Exaggeration207@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, BioWare does not need to be devoting its resources to SW:TOR at this point. It’s been out for a good, long while and the fact is, MMORPGs are not big money-makers these days. There was a huge wave of them in the wake of WoW’s success but none of them were able to achieve the kind of market success, player base or staying power of WoW. That ship has sailed, and it’s only appropriate to let the BioWare devs get back to doing what they do best.

      I don’t have high hopes for the next Dragon Age game, but would love to be pleasantly surprised. They’ve changed directions so many times during the development of that game, so I’m expecting the end result to be a mess. Mass Effect gives me slightly more hope as a possible return to form for BioWare though, if they learn from Andromeda’s missteps and focus on what made the original trilogy (particularly the first two games) great.

      • Christin White@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really want to see where they go with Mass Effect and I do hope they’ve learned from their mistakes. I actually think ME3 was better than 2 in a few respects right up until that terrible ending. ME:A turned out okay once they fixed the issues but it wasn’t the Mass Effect I was hoping for.

    • JC Denton@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I must be one of the 10 people who liked Andromeda but I believe it was unjustly criticized. It is more bland that the Mass Effect trilogy but still a decent game.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re allowed to enjoy something while still acknowledging it doesn’t live up to the other entries in the franchise.

        • Pigeon@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re also allowed to disagree and think it did live up to them, or exceeded. I know some die hard fans of Dragon Age 2, for instance.

          I haven’t played andromeda yet tho, I’ve no opinion.

    • _ed@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I played ME:A all the way through and… so much filler. Not a train wreck though, I tried to start another playthough and couldn’t do it because while the engine was good when you scratched the surface, it was just surface.

      For the record I love the mass-effection of Dragonage called Dragon Age 2 so I get it.