• snooggums@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ah yes, a law that sounds equal but mostly applies to women in practice due to who is most likely to change their name.

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Changing name due to marriage is specifically excluded from this requirement, likely due to the disproportionate effect on women.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        So it just ends up being disproportionately targeted at transgender people then.

        Sorry, I assumed it was like the TSA PreCheck which requires every name change a woman has gone through during their entire life.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Lots of other people change their names. Trans issues were hardly on the radar when this law was passed.

          And marriage records are a lot easier to track, and don’t involve changing first names. When someone changes their name for marriage, you can probably find out their maiden name fairly easily.

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            All legal name changes should be easy to track since it requires updating social security, insurance, driver’s licenses, and pretty much everything else.