Antisemitic incidents in the United States rose by about 400% in slightly over two weeks since war broke out in the Middle East after Palestinian Islamist group Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, advocacy group Anti-Defamation League (ADL) said Wednesday. Read more at straitstimes.com.

  • irmoz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    a battle between good workers and evil exploiters

    Quote me where you heard this. Any socialist also sympathises with the capitalist.

    a messianic prophecy

    So, who is the messiah? Socialists favour collective action over charismatic leaders.

    • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sympathise with “the capitalist” like the Nazis who wanted to send the Jews to Madagascar instead of killing them?

      Also, you don’t seem to get metaphors, do you?

      • irmoz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You just flip flopping don’t you? I thought you didn’t like moralising between good and evil? The sympathy is becuse capitalists must exploit in order to make a living, and if they’re a good person, it must be a hard thing to have to do.

        Yes, I get it’s a metaphor and doesn’t literally mean a song of God leading people to tge promised land. But the metaphor means a hero or liberator at the very least: an individual leading their people out of oppression into freedom. Socialists don’t think like this. It should be a democratic, popular, grssroots movement not led by any individual.

        • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Where does it say it has to be an individual? “Workers” could be the messiah

          Also, no you don’t “empathise with the capitalist” don’t lie to yourselves

          • irmoz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Where does it say it has to be an individual? Workers could be the messiah

            Lmao no. Not how messiah narratives work lad. Messiahs are heroic individuals. Stories about groups overcoming oppression are called revolutions or rebellions. Read a fucking book, mate.

            you don’t “empathise with the capitalist” don’t lie to yourselves

            Yes, yes I do. Because I know if I were in that position, I’d feel pretty damn awful about it. It’s hard enough just giving orders to begin with. It’s not a position that should exist. We seem to intuitively understand this with kings, but somehow capitalists is too far for people these day.

            • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The people that “overthrow capitalism” would be considered heroic individuals too

              For example, Lenin’s mummy is exposed in a fucking public plaza in the capital of Russia like if he was a monument

              • irmoz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Nope, they would be working class getting what they deserve. Also, no one overthrew capitalism is Russia. They didn’t have capitalism to begin with. Learn your history. They also never ended up with communism, if that’s what you’re gonna say. They had a state capitalism. And the veneration of individuals ia another clue we’re not dealing with a system about the people.

                I just love how you keep trying to prove me wrong, but can only find examples that prove me right. It’s beautiful.

                I love you.

                  • irmoz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Is a fly a real kangaroo? Definitions exist for a reason. Communism is stateless - the USSR had a state. Communism is moneyless - but they still used money. Communism erases class distinctions - guess what else? The USSR had class distinctions. Sorry buddy. You can tell me you have a car, but if it only has two wheels and no motor, it’s probably just a bicycle.