• Rapidcreek
    cake
    OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    It is war. It ends when one side gives up or is destroyed.

    • Lmaydev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Either side giving up will be genocide. Or destroyed, which is again genocide.

      So essentially your idea of resolution is genocide.

      • Rapidcreek
        cake
        OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not my idea. Name a war that ended differently.

          • Rapidcreek
            cake
            OP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            WWII ended with one side surrendering. There was quite a lot of slaughter before that happened.

            • Lmaydev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Right but if one side surrenders here they’ll lose their land and be destroyed. They aren’t similar.

              If hamas get Israel the Jewish population is fucked. Look at what’s happening now when they crossed the border. That wasn’t war it was slaughter of civilians.

              If Israel get Gaza the Palestinian population is fucked. Look at the westbank. That is isn’t war either.

              It’s not the same as any war. It’s 100 years of religious / racial conflict.

              The only end is an agreement or genocide. And 100 years have shown an agreement is unlikely.

              They came over the border a killed 1000 civilians. In retaliation Israel has killed 1000 civilians in air strikes. It’s not war. It’s slaughter.