Thumbnail is clickbait in the sense that the video does not address specific instances by specific creators, but is more of a call on everyone to reflect on certain behaviors we might/might not engage with. Just watch the first two minutes if that’s all the time you have right now, but do that much at least.
Edit: Some people are taking quotes that the AI has written in a comment and acting as if that’s what’s actually in the video. It’s not. I thought it should be obvious that if you want to critique the video, you have to watch it rather than depend on an AI to to provide a a summary.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Edit: Some people are taking quotes that the AI has written and acting as if that’s what’s actually in the video. It’s not. I thought it should be obvious that if you want to critique the video, you have to watch it rather than depend on an AI to to provide a a summary.
It’s a good summary. Misses some of the nuances, obviously, and makes it seem more basic/superficial than it is, but as far as the structure goes, I think it is good.
But one of the core parts of this video that really resonated with me, and which this summary missed entirely, was that at the end of every section, there were questions that the OP posed to us, the audience, to reflect/think on, based on that section. I think that’s extremely important, because, if you are willing to be challenged, then the video can do that. It’s not just “patriarchy bad”.
Don’t post shit like this here again. And if anyone sees this again let me know and I’ll lightning remove it.
Also if you want to participate in this community, participate in it don’t post AI garbage
I appreciate the AI summary being removed because of the way some people were taking it, but you might have been a bit too hostile. They’d edited the comment when they saw others take AI arguments seriously and as a substitute for the video, and at the bottom they’d mentioned a Men’s Lib group (the good kind) that talked about similar issues. So, I don’t think they were engaging in bad faith, just unfamiliar with how AI is perceived here.
You’re right, but the AI summary just muddies the discussion here. This is the Men’s Lib group they linked
It is not okay.
Message received. I won’t do it again.
Sorry if that was a bit aggressive, it does seem that you were trying to engage in good faith, I’m just not a fan of summarizing with LLMs unless it’s for a bit. They’ll never be able to actually parse the information in a video or book right and will just give you something that looks correct, but can misrepresent major parts of an argument or story.
How do you imagine that some LLM that doesn’t even have access to the video would be able to summarize it? I’d give it less than a 50% chance of giving a decent summary of most novels or short stories unless you paste the whole text into the prompt. What the hell is it supposed to do about a video?
I copied and pasted the whole transcript into Claude. That’s how.
But I get it. God damn.
That’s interesting. Doesn’t it have weird line breaks, or did you go through and fix those instead of just writing a summary yourself? At least from what I remember of retrieving a transcripts on YT recently, that’s how it goes.
Then again, we’re again talking about a LLM, so even if we imagine that it parses that okay for what it is, it’s still just using spitballing based on aggregated data to write what it thinks is plausible-sounding on a basis of syntax, vocabulary, and formatting rather than something like concepts. It’s much more the superficial level of communication than people tend to believe.
I’m sorry, what? Organizing and discussion are “male values”? Emotion and art are “female values”?
Jesus, talk about Patriarchal thinking.
They made the AI misogynistic. 😡
This is another example of the AI missing what is actually said. Please watch the actual video to get the actual argument.
Woah ”AI” (that learns from an undefined corpus of internet comtent) generating misogynistic output
lmao I think there’s a lot limiting breadtube’s revolutionary potential, misogyny included
If you want to critique the video, please do it after watching it, rather than taking what the AI wrote as gospel. It misses the nuances of the argument, even in what it wrote as the “thesis”.
nah
Point 4, does it matter if masculine action is more visible if private emotional work is successful? Just change the world.
Why does it not happen? Also a question worth pondering.