Francis Ford Coppola’s 140-minute, self-financed magnum opus received a mixed reaction at its Cannes Film Festival premiere on Thursday (16 May).

The Godfather director’s new dystopian drama, Megalopolis, stars Adam Driver as Cesar Catilina, an architect-scientist who wants to better a fictional version of New York City called New Rome.

Journalists present at the screening reported booing from the audience after the film ended. However, the boos quickly turned to cheers when an “In Memoriam” segment proceeded to play for Coppola’s late wife Eleanor, World of Reel’s Jordan Ruimy reported.

The director and cast then received a seven-minute standing ovation.

“Thank you all so much. It is so impossible to find words to tell you how I feel,” Coppola said after the credits rolled, introducing his family members to the audience.

Megalopolis has divided critics, debuting on the review aggregation site Rotten Tomatoes with a score of 53 per cent at the time of writing.

New York Magazine’s Bilge Ebiri wrote that, at times, the film “feels like the fevered thoughts of a precocious child, driven and dazzled and maybe a little lost in all the possibilities of the world before him”.

At one moment during the film, an actor reportedly appeared on the Cannes stage, playing a journalist, speaking to Cesar on the screen as if he were at a press conference.

  • mysoulishome@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 days ago

    It’s at 47% now yikes. Seems like most critics saying it’s horrible, a few saying it has some redeeming qualities, and some positive reviews that appear to be fake.

    • maegul@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 days ago

      The prestige Coppola carries certainly makes reviews less reliable for this, I’d say. Industry can’t let a good marketing angle slip by.

    • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      I’ve seen very few critics opinions that I’ve agreed with, and fewer I disagree with but voice their opinion in a way that isn’t purely subjective.
      Just mentioning because I’m seeing a horrible amount of journalist and journalist adjacent professionals doing very bad work.

      • mysoulishome@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I typically agree with the aggregate score on Rotten Tomatoes for about 85% of movies. Even when I don’t want to haha.

        • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Fair.
          I’ve found a lot of gems with 60% ratings. Usually the type that’s really well crafted, but requires people to watch and pay attention. The first thing that comes to mind as an example is the first season of the witcher. It was all laid out to understand, but you had to pay attention to the name drops. 68% critic score, but I thought that first season was excellent