@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me a logo about Thoughts and praxis about long-term wellbeing, contentment, and personal fulfillment in the spirit of Epicureanism with some Atheist influences style:cascade+

None of the above.

The counter to hypocrisy is not more hypocrisy. It’s no hypocrisy

I’m never joining another vc-backed social network whatever they promise.

Stockpiling resources isn’t possibly without exploitation. Why would anyone let you stockpile resources they create? These assumptions don’t make sense

Why beat around the bush. Just remove the concept of money altogether

I don’t have to argue against assertions without evidence

That’s not what Anarchism means. You can’t just redefine eastabilished political movements willy-nilly

Nonsense

That’s not what an “anarchistic dream” looks like, lol

I’m just saving all these golden takes.

Here’s me making the same arguments 14 years ago :* https://dbzer0.com/blog/voting-is-bad-mkay/

You…realize that in the system I’m talking about there’s no state or police?

Feel free to chill around here. I’m all about uplifting peeps!

Hate to break it to you, but your chess games have led you to the precipice of fascism and climate apocalypse. But keep playing, I’m sure the next game will reverse all that.

Again, assume she has the same lack of choice. What should she do? Why does that differ from what we should do?

That’s a good point actually. Arranged marriages existed for thousands of years. Women and girls were usually not given a choice, but even if when they were and chose the “lesser evil” it did nothing to end the tradition and evils of arranged marriage.

The fact that you’re continuously dodging the questions is not lost on me

If the woman doesn’t choose any, who does she end up with? What should she do about it? You clearly see the absurdity when presented as an analogy, but you cannot see the similarity because the violence of the politicians is many levels removed from you.

Non-participation is not the same as doing nothing. If she chooses to date neither, neither is in her life. If you do nothing, you still get trump or Biden. The analogy doesn’t hold.

Continue with that analogy. What would happen if that woman had no other option. Should she choose the nice guy, the chad or object to the choice being fostered upon her and choose nobody? And if she’s paired anyway with that person, should she then act as if it was her choice, or take actions to disengage from that person and destroy the system that caused these turn of events?

It fits. You say the analogy doesn’t fit because “we don’t have a choice”. I tell you to adjust the analogy so that the woman doesn’t have a choice either.