Dangling on a hyphen.

  • 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle



  • Yes, I’m a bit of a moron, but I still want to be fair. In every single community I read the same comment on and on again. It goes something like this:

    People in name_of_community are x.

    With its obvious variation

    name_of_community is y.

    That always sounds to me both strange and nonsensical. Every large set of beings is, obviously, large. We’re always sampling it from a very biased perspective. You may be unlucky in your interactions; or perhaps you’re more tactful; or you’ve connected in a very bad day; etc., etc., etc… So saying that name_of_community is y is just a Quixotian attack on a windmill.

    If that gets you high, elated, if it makes you feel better about yourself because you’re not like them, please go ahead and keep enjoying yourself. But also remember you’re riding an beaten old horse, wearing a rusty armor, and talking nonsense.






  • I’ve been messing with paru to gauge its functionality against yay.

    So far I’m unimpressed. The cli display is somewhat tidier/neat. I like that. But when it comes to actually installing something, it’s less than stellar.

    For instance, if I want to skip any confirmation, I can use the undocumented flag --noconfirm. But that only works if I’m passing the flag to install, -S. If, say, I’m searching for a package, simply typing paru <package>, then the interactive menu no longer works. It simply exits with the message ‘nothing to do’.

    yay, on the other hand, works flawlessly with the --noconfirm flag.

    I noticed that paru has some upgrading/updating features that are nice. I might use it once in a while to upgrade/update the system. But that’s pretty much it for now.





  • True. Not everyone agrees. Since I’m just me, I can only speak for myself.

    With this in mind, I would like to hear reasons why you or others don’t agree. I ask in good faith.

    Having an opinion is as natural as being human. I see the world through my eyes, think about in my brain, color it by my life experiences. So there’s always the possibility that I might be missing something important. Perhaps you were persuaded by some strong and much valid point or points.

    If that’s the case, and if you’re willing, can you please share why you disagree?








  • Let me try to see if I get the logic here. So a company fires a lot of people, and then another company hires them.

    These workers then are leveraged by the new company to do something similar to what they have been doing in the previous company. This allows the new company to create a competing product that seems to capture part of the previous company’s market.

    But now the first company wants to sue the second company for… leveraging those recently dismissed workers?

    One of those companies seem to be acting in a very strategically sound way, and it’s not the one which fired those workers in the first place…