I really dont understand americans

Politicians strategically used gun rights as a wedge issue to ensure that the segment of the population with the most guns are more likely to be intensely loyal to the fascist continent of our political class. Furthermore, our law enforcement has more and even bigger guns.

None of the above.

Piss off tankie.

There’s artificial practice skin for learning how to tattoo.

I see 3 desires and no proposed course of action. There’s no plan here to make an independent vote be anything aside from a waste. There’s nothing to set forth a series of events that leads to more people discarding the conceptualization of political sports teams. There’s a difference between being “idealistic” and not having any plan. I am idealistic. I’ve told you my plan, and I believe it has the potential to bring about the results you want, so even if there’s really no way for you to support my endeavor you should at least stop trying to make my task harder.

“Freezing”? This take is so cold that upon uttering it hydrogen condenses into a 0-viscosity liquid.

🫂

That strikes me as overly reductionist. Biden’s definitely not doing enough to stop the genocide, but he didn’t cause it. He’s also not a vital instrument of the apparatus that’s allowing it to be executed.

If Earth is ever invaded by brain-eating aliens, I’m going to advocate presenting you as our envoy so they think there’s no food here.

I think both premises are well-justified by the presented evidence. That is to say, doing either effectively makes suicide nets vanishingly unlikely.

It’s simple: China is an ultra-capitalist nightmare county and anyone who disagrees is either a liar or a fool.

Can confirm.

(I’m both a mathematician and a pervert)

Okay. Please describe what you course of action you’re advocating for and the intended results.

You also can’t call something infinity

Why do you think that?

I’m aware. Algebra is what I’m most interested in, and so when someone says “0” I think “additive identity of a ring” unless context makes the use obvious.

Edit: I’ve given it some thought, and I’m not convinced all algebras can fit in a set, because every non-empty set can have at least one algebra imposed upon them, and so the set of all algebras must have cardinality no less than the proper class of all sets. We also can’t have a set of all algebras (up to isomorphism) because iirc the surreal numbers are an algebra imposed on a structure that itself incorporates a proper class, and is thus incapable of being a set element.

I’m not familiar with Austrian economics, but the description here seems almost correct.

I’ll need to look at it more; it sounds interesting.

💝

Have you considered that complaining about Americans voting when you don’t need to live with the consequences is, perhaps, not exactly good form?

I’m not familiar with IEEE 754.

Edit: I think this sort of space shouldn’t be the kind where people get downvoted for admitting ignorance honestly, but maybe that’s just me.