• SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    But then you need to do significant construction with that material. And it’s not just one material: there are pipes, electrical, insulation, flooring, etc. It’s only replacing a few admittedly major parts of the material. Everything else still takes tons of labor. I could be wrong, but I’m not convinced the labor savings are greater compared to modular housing.

    • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’re probably right, right now. But I am put in mind of ya boi Ben Franklin when asked “What use is [a prototype hot air balloon]” He replied “What is the use of a newborn child?”

      Early plastic 3d printers were clunky and of poor quality, but now entire industries have spawned around them and they have revolutionised at-home prototyping.

      Right now, this is a gimmick. But the potential, if nurtured is pretty serious, imo.

      • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, I suppose I’m questioning even the potential. Some technologies don’t pan out, which is why we’re not all riding around on our Segways. Underestimating future technology is certainly one risk, but the other risk is assuming every technology is inevitable progress.

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      How much do you know about the costs for standard construction vs printed construction?

        • XTL@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s one top reason some are doing this. Experiment and try to find or develop a profitable business segment. There’s very rarely a ready market for any new process.