You said that “Israel manufactured the situation”. It’s clear your intention is putting the onus entirely on one side when history shows this is not the case. I’m not going to bother with reiterating the entire history of the region. If we are going to reduce all historic fact to such gross oversimplifications, we might as well say nothing. You may say I’m being pedantic, but your biased messaging is clear. The genocide topic is just a convenient way to sidestep my initial point (even after I conceded the genocide thing) which is why you keep bringing it up. If you can’t engage with one point without having to keep pivoting to these other topics then it’s clear you are either illiterate or just bad faith.
So there’s no material context I’ve missed in the oversimplification you’re claiming I’ve engaged in (I’ve asked you many times now), you don’t have a point, and you’re just being a genocide-defending piece of shit that’s too cowardly to own their positions.
I say this with deepest sincerity - fuck you, you utter waste of a human life.
You know what I can play the same game and simplify history to my liking. Check this out: Japan manufactured Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Wow. What brilliant insight from scholars such as Waxed. Oh by the way, every time I can’t defend a point I will call the other side guilty of genocide. Brilliant.
Did Japan work to support the rise of a government that wanted to kill them over one that didn’t? I know about the internment camps, but wasn’t aware Japan was turned into an open air concentration camp.
Whats a genocide?
Did the US president explicitly say the intended to genocide Japan?
Was one Japanese soldier being killed a genocide?
You’re bad faith.
Did Japan genocide the US, actually?
If you don’t know the name of the president’s dog’s mother, can you really call this a genocide?
I don’t support the US.
Such a dipshitted distraction from the point - you still haven’t pointed out that context I missed in my oversimplification.
You said that “Israel manufactured the situation”. It’s clear your intention is putting the onus entirely on one side when history shows this is not the case. I’m not going to bother with reiterating the entire history of the region. If we are going to reduce all historic fact to such gross oversimplifications, we might as well say nothing. You may say I’m being pedantic, but your biased messaging is clear. The genocide topic is just a convenient way to sidestep my initial point (even after I conceded the genocide thing) which is why you keep bringing it up. If you can’t engage with one point without having to keep pivoting to these other topics then it’s clear you are either illiterate or just bad faith.
So there’s no material context I’ve missed in the oversimplification you’re claiming I’ve engaged in (I’ve asked you many times now), you don’t have a point, and you’re just being a genocide-defending piece of shit that’s too cowardly to own their positions.
I say this with deepest sincerity - fuck you, you utter waste of a human life.
You know what I can play the same game and simplify history to my liking. Check this out: Japan manufactured Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Wow. What brilliant insight from scholars such as Waxed. Oh by the way, every time I can’t defend a point I will call the other side guilty of genocide. Brilliant.
Yeah - the difference is that I pointed out why.
Did Japan work to support the rise of a government that wanted to kill them over one that didn’t? I know about the internment camps, but wasn’t aware Japan was turned into an open air concentration camp.
Whats a genocide?
Did the US president explicitly say the intended to genocide Japan?
Was one Japanese soldier being killed a genocide?
You’re bad faith.
Did Japan genocide the US, actually?
If you don’t know the name of the president’s dog’s mother, can you really call this a genocide?
I don’t support the US.
Such a dipshitted distraction from the point - you still haven’t pointed out that context I missed in my oversimplification.