• fearout@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh. You can probably solve it with a good enough artificial narrow intelligence. Or/and dedicated infrastructure, inter-car communication protocols, etc. The issue is it’s solving the wrong problem altogether.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Years ago (maybe still) Microsoft had a research facility for self-driving infrastructure. Instead of putting all the recognition and awareness in the car itself, a lot of it was offloaded the mini city they built. Streets and stop signs with embedded RFID, etc.

        This, of course, doesn’t stop pedestrians from dying. But I thought it was a cool approach to the problem to “update the world” instead of trying to make a product that navigates our unmodernized infrastructure

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe, though trams only work in town. I couldn’t go see my family with a tram but I could put my self-driving city car in manual and take it out past the cornfields.

            I think a lot of things have to change outside of major cities for public transportation to really take off as a concept here. There is SO much “empty” space in the US, it’s hard to imagine getting infrastructure out there that mainly only benefits a handful of people

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If there was dedicated lanes/infrastructure it might be possible but makes more sense for cities to improve public transportation. A bus/train is a big fancy car powered by a general intelligence.