• capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Jan 26, 2006

    Fatah supporters took to the streets of Ramallah last night to celebrate a victory that was not theirs. The exit polls got it wrong. The faction founded by the late Yasser Arafat had not, in fact, won a narrow victory. Instead, it was roundly defeated by the radical Islamic organization Hamas.

    And by day, it was Hamas supporters who were jamming the streets. Running in their first national electoral outing, Hamas candidates won a huge victory, securing 76 seats to Fatah’s 43 in the Palestinian Legislative Council.

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/hamas-wins-palestinian-authority-elections

    • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      What’s the date today? That was over 17 years ago. NOW the Gazan people are prisoners of Hamas. They need to be freed.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is straight up, unmasked whataboutism. Yes, what you brought up also is bad.

        BUT. My comment was a direct reply to a comment suggesting the people of Palestine don’t support Hamas so I was dispelling that particular fiction.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Literally, yes.

            Read up: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

            You can’t stay on topic. Why is that? I’ll help, it’s because you don’t want to admit I’m right and you’re grasping at anything rather than let yourself acknowledge it.

            I’ll help some more. This excerpt exactly explains what you did:

            denotes in a pejorative sense a procedure in which a critical question or argument is not answered or discussed, but retorted with a critical counter-question which expresses a counter-accusation