• DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I used to use it but switched to brave after reading that DDG lied about tracking.
      Any others? (and not the one that requires a subscription, thanks)

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not heard of them, will check it out, thanks!

          E: a quick look tells me it doesn’t work with VPN, so that’s a no from me…

          • resketreke@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s strange, I use Mullvad VPN and Startpage is my main search engine and It’s only given me trouble once. They made me fill a captcha and wait a while in order to be able to use it again, but it was just an our at most.

            • DessertStorms@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I read quite a few reviews that said they were having this problem, and I don’t really have the kind of patience it takes to wait that long. 😂

      • reflex@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        DDG lied about tracking

        FWIW though, I think that agreement no longer applies. I getchu though, on the principle of the matter, assuming they actually lied about it. E.g., if they said, “we don’t let any tracking through,” without mentioning their deal with Microsoft. If they just said, “we block most trackers,” and let people hype it up in their heads though, that’s kind of a gray area IMHO.

        • Thorned_Rose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          DDG also curates/censors/biases the results though.

          And even if the company thinks it’s for a good reason, they’ve set themselves a precedent and now we don’t know what else they could be curating, censoring or biasing in their search results.

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          tbf I didn’t know about the agreement no longer being relevant, but yeah, like you say it’s a grey area and weakens the trust at least some.
          If I don’t find any better alternative I guess its back to the duck I go…

          • reflex@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess its back to the duck I go…

            That’s the reality of the situation unfortunately. No infallible heroes, just fifty shades of grey.

      • Brayd@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that topic got really heated back then. DDG is far more transparent than any other companies and also did a statement regarding this. Besides that it’s still the most private search engine next to Searxng. And SearXNG is less convenient.

        That’s also the reason why it is still used within the Tor browser for example.