now they’re making a live action moana in 2025. it hasn’t even been 10 years, disney is lowballing so hard with these lifeless remakes. hopefully ariel flops bad enough that they change their minds.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Live action remakes are fine if they bring something new to the table that brings a new perspective to the original.

    Like the upcoming “Barbie” movie, for example.

  • politemenace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The new Little Mermaid was fantastic. Hard disagree, as long as they keep the quality. I didn’t care for most of the other live actions.

  • wwaxwork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Little Mermaid was good, they put more effort into the casting this time I think which helped, nothing against the other actors, but Halley can sing like an angel and Melissa McCarthy did Divine proud. I think a lot of it has to do with copyright more than anything else. While they don’t reset the copyright, they give Disney vast new swaths of copyrightable material on the same subject with the same name. But lord they totally do NOT need a new version of Moana yet.

  • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve always wanted the opposite to happen. I want to see live action movies made as cartoons. Mostly with sci-fi/fantasy stuff where the impossible is made possible, and animation would make visualizing some of the fantastic things a lot better and ultimately easier. I mean if 90% of the movie is already animated with CGI, why not just also animate the last 10%, too? 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • Marine_Mustang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll know they are serious when they remake Song of the South. All live-action segments are now animated, previously animated segments are now live-action.

    You know what, let’s not stop there. Live-action remakes of the Don Bluth movies, starting with The Secret of NIMH, then All Dogs Go To Heaven, An American Tail, then Land Before Time. Shit, let’s do Rankin, too! Who’s up for a live-action The Last Unicorn?

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They would never do it, but I think an honest remake of Song of the South would be absolutely amazing.

      Leave the rich white people out, have the characters be entirely made up from the ex-slave sharecroppers. Show the miserable conditions, and show their escape into the fantasy of Uncle Remus.

      Maybe make the reflection of the real-life antagonists a bit more clear with the characters of Br’er Bear and Br’er Fox, and maybe stir in some revenge fantasy while you’re at it.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is because their previous CEO said animated movies are for kids:

    https://gizmodo.com/disney-ceo-bob-chapek-animated-films-quote-frozen-pixar-1849710032

    The board finally got rid of him and his mentality, but the “make everything live action so that people who think animation = kid can still watch our stuff” division is still churning out stuff while the “how do I make AI art into a whole Disney movie for pennies” division is still trying to get off the ground.

    • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, he was right. Those movies were 100% made and designed with children as their primary target audience. Can an adult enjoy them too? Sure, why not? An adult can enjoy a cartoon like ninja turtles or a video games like mario, so they can enjoy Disney cartoons. By virtue of it being targeted for a young demographic from conception, makes it not “for adults” by its definition. I can’t believe this dude got fired because a bunch of people got upset about that statement.

      • ech0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The author of the above article is either a complete moron, watches Disney as his only form of entertainment, or works at Disney, because he seems to be taking what the CEO said REALLY personal.

        The CEO said that after parents watch an animated film like Frozen with their kids for the 2nd time that night, when they go to bed, they might want to put on another animated film like Toy story or Beauty and the Beast for themselves??

        WTF??

        I don’t know what planet he lives on but most parents I know would rather shoot themselves. They are gonna put on a real show like a crime show or a drama or something, not an animated film.

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you have a typo where you describe Bob Chapek’s statement. According to the article, what he said was:

          “I always say that when our fans and our audiences put their kids to bed at night after watching Pinocchio or Dumbo or Little Mermaid, they’re probably not going to tune into another animated movie. They want something for them.”

          And the writer of the article is clear that parents may not be interested in watching another animated film. However, he appears to be making the point that the CEO of Disney shouldn’t be suggesting that people move away from Disney content. It might seem ridiculous that adults would want to continue watching Disney, but at the same time, keeping eyeballs on Disney content is a big part of the Disney CEO’s job.