• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t remember if Windows updates would cause it but installing Windows second definitely would. Likewise, I think upgrading (from say Windows 7 to 10) might. Basically Windows is just like “this MBR? It’s actually mine, thanks.” With no option to not erase it.

    • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      EFI systems don’t use the MBR. Windows will default to using the whole disk if you don’t use the “advanced” button, but so will most linux distro installers.

        • Ooops@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          2009 usually means you could indeed run it without an MBR: GPT format plus a very small (2MB) partition flagged to take over the functionality of containing a bootloader normally embedded in the MBR.

      • Ooops@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Correct. But Windows is not changing the BIOS boot order. It will however change your EFI to make itself the default boot again, even if you configured it to use a separate ESP on a completely separate disk and the boot menu residing there. That’s by design as you can access your efi settings from a running system via software, while your chances to change your BIOS settings from outside the BIOS are slim to non-existent.

        Also every BIOS not decades old can indead run with a hybrid setup of GPT formated disk with a small partiton to replace the MBR functionality.