top-ology
Yes
Professional developer and amateur gardener located near Atlanta, GA in the USA.
top-ology
Yes
I think generally the order implies who is in the middle. I think. So FFM would imply a male and female servicing a female while FMF is two females servicing a male.
I play a Paladin because I wanna have high strength for carrying and not have to rely on someone who wants always be in my party but also have a high charisma because of the (in my opinion bizarre) way that charisma checks force the character in the dialogue to do it and not allow another character to sort of step in for that moment.
Other than that I leave everyone as their default class except for Wyll who I made into a Bard because I think Warlocks suck and don’t enjoy playing them.
Natural selection led to our intelligence to be able to made medicine in the first place.
They’re called servers in the UI though. Also, confusingly, there is a new feature coming called guilds.
They’re called direct messages, not private messages. They’re not tricking anyone into thinking anything lmao
OH! I literally didn’t put it together what character this was until you posted this. I don’t play much Magic but ran an Theros campaign so deep dove on titan lore. Glad to see the cycle finished hopefully!
There’s something about using the same sort of lenses that allow tilt shift. You just shift the lense to the side. Idk how to explain because I only sort of understand it and am not a photographer.
Honestly that sounds like the correct salary for being in charge of a big foundation
To make Bing the default search engine lol
Thanks for letting me know, 8 didn’t actually know that. I don’t think I’ll ever own a Diesel vehicle but I’ll keep it in mind that it’s not so simple as emptying the tank lol
Twitter is to Mastodon as Reddit is to Lemmy.
Is D&D in danger? D&D is in this weird place where it’s in the middle of a lot of things. It’s honestly pretty complex compared to actually rules light systems, but it’s still much less complex than Pathfinder. If folks want more crunch they go to Pathfinder.
D&D has two pillars. Combat and everything else. I know that WotC defines it differently but generally I think it’s easier to view like this. Everything I’m combat is extremely rigid. Everything outside is pretty flexible. Sure, exploration has more rigid rules than social interactions but I genuinely don’t believe many people use rigid exploration rules. I think a lot of players dislike combat for a big variety of reasons. There are extremely few class-specific special things some classes can do outside of combat. Do fighters get anything special? Not really. And a lot of spells can totally negate specific things other players might be able to contribute.
It would be really nice to have flexible combat but I don’t think there’s a good way to do it without fundamentally changing the game. Instead, I believe every class needs to have meaningful ways to contribute to each pillar of play that cannot be one-upped by spells.
Another thing, I believe every class should have the same amount of limited resources more like 4th edition but I don’t think there’s a way to fix that in 5th edition or the new version without fundamentally rewriting everything.
I think that it serves two purposes:
I put gasoline in my diesel motor, wtf is wrong, it won’t work
PS2 definitely had online play. I never played online but my friend did.
But it McDo
They cover over 99% of my city with fiber and I can walk to city hall from my house. Still doesn’t cover my street.