• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was nonsense from the start. Grusch had no evidence, not so much as a blurry photo or shaky video. All he had was what someone told him. So someone supposedly told him that not only did the U.S. have multiple crashed UFOs and bodies, but that one of them crashed in Mussolini’s Italy and the Pope helped the U.S. smuggle it out.

    And people ate that shit up. And they’re still saying the big revelation is right around the corner, as it has been my entire life.

    • lildictator@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it was nonsense, why did the Inspector General find his allegations “credible and urgent”, and forwarded them to Congress, where Grusch and other whistleblowers deposed under oath? And why have several Congressional committees announced that public hearings will be held in the upcoming months?

      Let’s not make the mistake of thinking that just because evidence has not been made available to us it means there is none. We don’t get to learn the most highly classified weaponry in the Pentagon, why would non-human technology be released any more widely? If you want more information to be made public, go write a letter to your elected officials telling them this matters to you.

        • lildictator@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          > you need to touch grass, the text you sent just has the same allegations, nothing new nothing concrete

          The details are classified. You and I don’t get to see them. The people who do get to see the classified evidence, like some of the congresspeople I mentioned, take it seriously. The whistleblowers have allegedly provided Congress with the names of the people in charge of the reverse-engineering projects and the locations of the materials.

          Think again about that: the elected representatives with the best access to the most sensitive information take it seriously.

          What alternative explanation do you have for multiple congresspeople from both sides of the aisle being willing to investigate these claims and writing new laws to encourage more whistleblowers to come out?

          > why have i never heard of flying saucers in africa?

          How much news do you get from Africa, generally? You won’t know things when you don’t look for them.

          One of the most widely known mass UFO sightings happened in Zimbabwe in 1994 in the Ariel School.

          • inurblacchole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; however, there is none.

            congresspeople taking it seriously doesn’t mean much. they also take climate denial seriously. they took anti vaccines seriously. they’re just laywers, by and large. they don’t actually know much of anything about science or the probability of aliens visiting or whatever.

            as a (former) astronomer, let me tell you that even if there does exist life in the universe outside of our own, even if these lifeforms travel these vast distances fast (somehow, the physics isn’t really clear), even if these supposed spacecraft are manned, the probability of anything visiting earth is infinitesimally small. the universe is just too big and empty. think about it, space has on average a single hydrogen atom per cubic meter. on earth an equivalent volume of air, let’s say, holds 10^25 atoms. and throughout billions of lightyears of this dark, empty vacuum you stumble upon…us? it just doesn’t make any sense when you think about it. sure, the idea of aliens visiting is cool but at the end of the day, it aint happenin

          • Firipu@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            The fact that Trump never reveiled anything about Aliens is all the proof you need. He would never have been able to shut it about it if there was even a grain of truth to it

            • lildictator@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What makes you think that the alleged programs that have been supposedly kept secret from the Congress for decades were revealed to Trump? It stands to reason that if such programs existed, they would have been hidden from him as well.

              • Firipu@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean, if you start like that, there is no discussion to be had. “If eVeN tHe prESidEnT doESn’t know”

                *insert dickbutt meme

                • lildictator@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But that is precisely the central allegation of the whistleblowers that we are discussing: that certain research programs have been kept hidden from the Congress. And that is why the Congress has already passed bills to encourage whistleblowers to come out and report what they know specifically about UFOs.

                  Why did they write such specific legislation? Do you think it may be because they already knew about some whistleblowers that wanted to speak?

      • Deestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Credible and urgent” referred to his fear of reprisals after claiming whistle blower status. The Inspector General rightly considers this completely isolated from the legitimacy of the leaked information itself.

        • lildictator@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My understanding is that it referred to his allegations that some programs are being funded without the necessary Congressional oversight.

          Either way, the matter of fact is that Congress is addressing these concerns regarding oversight, not the reprisals suffered by this particular person. See the recently proposed regulation by Gallagher.

  • irkli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    The U stands for UNIDENTIFIED. Unidentified means just that. It’s not wink wink for alien spacecraft.

  • lildictator@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is very much moving forward. Senator Marco Rubio has stated that he takes David Grusch’s testimony seriously. Rubio is a member of the Gang of Eight, the group of people in Congress who receive the most sensitive US intelligence.

    Rubio has stated that Grusch is not the only whistleblower who has come forward and testified to Congress. According to him, over the last two years there have been multiple other highly-ranked officials sharing with Congress their first-hand knowledge of secret programs to reverse-engineer non-human technology, corroborating Grusch’s claims.

    Senator Gillibrand and Rep. Burchett have publicly announced that in the coming months they intend to hold public hearings to hear the evidence put forth by Grusch and other UFO whistleblowers in various committees in Congress.

    If you find the subject intriguing and would like to learn more, I can recommend the podcast Need to Know by Ross Coulthart and Bryce Zabel. Other good sources of information that have also been proven reliable in the past few years are The Debrief and Liberation Times.